Table 2.

Parameter estimates of the brand choice model incorporating the brand-contingent attribute-weighting process

Parameter estimateModel 1
Main effects
Model 2
Model 1 + interaction effects
The main effect of brand position
Negativity (inferior position)0.118 (0.044)***0.107 (0.043)**
Positivity (superior position)−0.019 (0.033)−0.021 (0.032)
The interaction with brand usage experience
Negativity x Brand usage experience 0.015 (0.010)
Positivity x Brand usage experience 0.010 (0.005)**
Brand usage experience −0.005 (0.004)
Intrinsic attribute importance
Mean attribute importance – Safety0.486 (0.243)**0.405 (0.200)**
Mean attribute importance – Affordability1.640 (0.467)***1.687 (0.486)***
Mean attribute importance – Service friendliness0.603 (0.270)**0.654 (0.266)**
Mean attribute importance – Cabin cleanliness−0.632 (0.220)***−0.591 (0.205)***
Standard deviation – Safety0.325 (0.221)0.467 (0.223)**
Standard deviation – Affordability1.090 (0.387)***1.183 (0.483)**
Standard deviation – Service friendliness0.366 (0.225)0.408 (0.180)***
Standard deviation – Cabin cleanliness0.626 (0.431)0.105 (0.198)
AIC559.066557.550

Notes:

The AIC of the baseline model without the brand-contingent weighting process is 565.148.

***

p < 0.01,

**

p < 0.05 based on two-tailed tests. Standard errors are shown in parentheses

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options