Comparison of set membership in csQCA and fsQCA
| Configuration | Crisp N | Crisp % | Fuzzy Best-fit N | Fuzzy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Szrc | 16 | 25.40 | 12 | 20.34 |
| SZRC | 15 | 23.81 | 18 | 30.51 |
| szrC | 6 | 9.52 | 5 | 8.47 |
| SZRc | 4 | 6.35 | 5 | 8.47 |
| SZrc | 4 | 6.35 | 2 | 3.39 |
| SzRC | 3 | 4.76 | 2 | 3.39 |
| Szrc | 3 | 4.76 | 3 | 5.08 |
| sZRc | 3 | 4.76 | 4 | 6.78 |
| sZRC | 2 | 3.17 | 3 | 5.08 |
| sZrC | 2 | 3.17 | 0 | 0.00 |
| sZrc | 2 | 3.17 | 1 | 1.69 |
| SzRc | 1 | 1.59 | 1 | 1.69 |
| SzrC | 1 | 1.59 | 1 | 1.69 |
| szRC | 1 | 1.59 | 1 | 1.69 |
| SZrC | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
| szRc | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 1.69 |
| Total | 63 | 100.00 | 59 | 100.00 |
| Configuration | Crisp | Crisp % | Fuzzy Best-fit | Fuzzy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 25.40 | 12 | 20.34 | |
| 15 | 23.81 | 18 | 30.51 | |
| 6 | 9.52 | 5 | 8.47 | |
| 4 | 6.35 | 5 | 8.47 | |
| 4 | 6.35 | 2 | 3.39 | |
| 3 | 4.76 | 2 | 3.39 | |
| 3 | 4.76 | 3 | 5.08 | |
| 3 | 4.76 | 4 | 6.78 | |
| 2 | 3.17 | 3 | 5.08 | |
| 2 | 3.17 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 3.17 | 1 | 1.69 | |
| 1 | 1.59 | 1 | 1.69 | |
| 1 | 1.59 | 1 | 1.69 | |
| 1 | 1.59 | 1 | 1.69 | |
| 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 1.69 | |
| Total | 63 | 100.00 | 59 | 100.00 |
Note(s): Similarity of distributions test: ChiSquare = 6.68, d.f. = 13, p = 0.92
S = sensing high, Z = seizing high, R = reconfiguring high, C = consensus high, s = sensing low, z = seizing low, r = reconfiguring low, c = consensus low
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.