Table 6

Out-of-sample forecast evaluation of oil risk models [Nested models]

Historical average (HA) versus Brent
GlobalEuropeUSAsiaSolarWind
RMSEHABrentHABrentHABrentHABrentHABrentHABrent
h = 100.9190.9191.2781.2781.1471.1471.2971.2971.7601.7601.1871.175
h = 300.9210.9211.2751.2741.1461.1461.2951.2941.7571.7581.1861.174
h = 601.0481.0421.2701.2701.1431.1431.2891.2881.7571.7581.1911.180
h = 120
1.114
1.104
1.258
1.257
1.134
1.134
1.280
1.279
1.751
1.751
1.180
1.169
CW
HA
Brent
HA
Brent
HA
Brent
HA
Brent
HA
Brent
HA
Brent
h = 100.0010.003−0.0010.0040.0020.039***
(0.002)(0.002)(0.001)(0.003)(0.004)(0.014)
h = 300.0010.003−0.0010.0040.0020.039***
(0.001)(0.002)(0.001)(0.003)(0.004)(0.013)
h = 600.0140.004−0.0010.0040.0020.038***
(0.009)(0.002)(0.001)(0.002)(0.004)(0.013)
h = 1200.033***0.003−0.0010.0040.0010.036***
(0.012)(0.002)(0.001)(0.002)(0.004)(0.012)
Historical average (HA) versus WTI
GlobalEuropeUSAsiaSolarWind
RMSEHAWTIHAWTIHAWTIHAWTIHAWTIHAWTI
h = 100.9190.9171.2781.2761.1471.1451.2971.2961.7601.7591.1871.166
h = 300.9210.9191.2751.2721.1461.1441.2951.2931.7571.7561.1861.166
h = 601.0481.0371.2701.2681.1431.1411.2891.2871.7571.7571.1911.172
h = 120
1.114
1.100
1.258
1.255
1.134
1.132
1.280
1.278
1.751
1.750
1.180
1.162
CW
HA
WTI
HA
WTI
HA
WTI
HA
WTI
HA
WTI
HA
WTI
h = 100.006**0.009**0.006**0.007**0.0090.070***
(0.003)(0.004)(0.002)(0.003)(0.007)(0.024)
h = 300.006**0.010**0.006**0.007**0.0100.069***
(0.003)(0.004)(0.002)(0.003)(0.007)(0.024)
h = 600.026*0.010**0.005**0.007**0.0090.067***
(0.014)(0.004)(0.002)(0.003)(0.007)(0.023)
h = 1200.046***0.010**0.005**0.007**0.0090.063***
(0.017)(0.004)(0.002)(0.003)(0.007)(0.022)

Note(s): This table presents the results for the forecast evaluation of the oil risk based models where either the realized volatility of WTI or Brent price serve as the predictor. The forecast evaluation analysis compares the oil risk-based models with the HA model given that we are dealing with the return series of the clean energy prices. The oil risk-based models and HA model are “nested” since the latter can be seen as a subset of the former, hence the choice of Clark and West as the forecast evaluation test. The rejection of the null hypothesis of the Clark and West test indicates the better performance of the preferred models. “*”, “**” and “***” indicates statistical significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% significance levels

Source(s): Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal