Hedging role of clean energy assets against temperature anomaly
| Global | Europe | US | Asia | Solar | Wind | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0216*** | 4.2175** | −2.1038*** | 3.3167*** | 2.3219** | 4.2501 | |
| (0.4430) | (1.8169) | (0.3395) | (0.0891) | (1.0308) | (2.6122) | |
| −4.2793*** | −4.2177** | 4.6775*** | −3.2976*** | 0.5319 | −4.2796 | |
| (0.6975) | (1.9095) | (0.5248) | (0.1609) | (1.1828) | (2.9614) | |
| Hedging role? | No hedge | No hedge | Hedge | No hedge | No hedge | No hedge |
| Global | Europe | US | Asia | Solar | Wind | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0216*** | 4.2175** | −2.1038*** | 3.3167*** | 2.3219** | 4.2501 | |
| (0.4430) | (1.8169) | (0.3395) | (0.0891) | (1.0308) | (2.6122) | |
| −4.2793*** | −4.2177** | 4.6775*** | −3.2976*** | 0.5319 | −4.2796 | |
| (0.6975) | (1.9095) | (0.5248) | (0.1609) | (1.1828) | (2.9614) | |
| Hedging role? | No hedge | No hedge | No hedge | No hedge | No hedge |
Note(s): The table presents the predictability results that indicate the hedging effectiveness of disaggregated clean energy assets against climate risk measured with risk associated with climate change (temperature anomaly). and are the constant and Beta-adjusted coefficient of the models with temperature anomaly as the predictor. The hedging role is informed by the Beta-adjusted coefficients. indicates ‘no hedge’, indicates ‘hedge’. “**” and “***” indicates statistical significance at 5% and 1% significance levels
Source(s): Table by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.