Table III Correlation matrix (1) (2) (3)... | Emerald Publishing

Table III

Correlation matrix

	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)	(9)	(10)
(1) Need finance	.
(2) Constraints	0.455*	.
(3) region_met	−0.053	−0.053	.
(4) size_ln	−0.030	−0.085*	−0.052	.
(5) age_ln	−0.042	−0.034	−0.019	0.218*	.
(6) subsidiary	−0.113*	−0.074*	0.043	0.031	0.039	.
(7) inno inc_ln	0.038	0.070*	0.019	0.186*	0.051	0.002	.
(8) inno rad_ln	0.021	0.262*	−0.001	0.071*	−0.030	−0.037*	0.427*	.
(9) imp tech	−0.000	0.002	0.020	0.002	0.004	0.009	−0.014	0.017	.
(10) imp ipr	0.040	0.034	0.039*	0.003	−0.065*	−0.034	0.038	0.098*	0.138*	.
(11) imp market	0.011	0.003	0.002	0.055	0.027	0.004	0.058	0.048	0.104*	0.243*

	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)	(9)	(10)
(1) Need finance	.
(2) Constraints	0.455*	.
(3) region_met	−0.053	−0.053	.
(4) size_ln	−0.030	−0.085*	−0.052	.
(5) age_ln	−0.042	−0.034	−0.019	0.218*	.
(6) subsidiary	−0.113*	−0.074*	0.043	0.031	0.039	.
(7) inno inc_ln	0.038	0.070*	0.019	0.186*	0.051	0.002	.
(8) inno rad_ln	0.021	0.262*	−0.001	0.071*	−0.030	−0.037*	0.427*	.
(9) imp tech	−0.000	0.002	0.020	0.002	0.004	0.009	−0.014	0.017	.
(10) imp ipr	0.040	0.034	0.039*	0.003	−0.065*	−0.034	0.038	0.098*	0.138*	.
(11) imp market	0.011	0.003	0.002	0.055	0.027	0.004	0.058	0.048	0.104*	0.243*

Note: *p< 0.01, two-tailed Pearson correlation