Number of expert participants per focus group
| No. | Group according to global competitiveness index (2018) | Country | No. of participants | Participants profiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Competitively advanced | Austria | 6 | 3 industry representatives 2 academic HPC representatives 1 policy maker—national level |
| 2 | Czech Republic | 6 | 3 industry representatives 1 academic HPC representatives 2 policy maker—national level | |
| 3 | Germany (Baden-Württemberg) | 7 | 3 industry representatives 4 academic HPC representatives | |
| 4 | Slovenia | 15 | 10 industry representatives 3 academic HPC representatives 2 policy makers—national level | |
| 5 | Competitively intermediate | Bulgaria | 6 | 2 industry representatives 2 academic HPC representatives 2 policy makers—national level |
| 6 | Hungary | 10 | 6 industry representatives 3 academic HPC representatives 1 policy makers—national level | |
| 7 | Romania | 5 | 2 industry representatives 1 academic HPC representatives 2 policy makers—national level | |
| 8 | Slovakia | 6 | 3 industry representatives 1 academic HPC representatives 2 policy makers—national level | |
| 9 | Competitively lagging | Croatia | 5 | 3 industry representatives 2 academic HPC representatives |
| 10 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 4 | 2 industry representatives 1 academic HPC representatives 1 policy maker—local level | |
| 11 | Moldova | 4 | 1 industry representative 1 academic HPC representative 2 policy makers—national level | |
| 12 | Montenegro | 3 | 2 industry representatives 1 academic HPC representatives | |
| 13 | Serbia | 10 | 5 industry representatives 3 academic HPC representatives 2 policy makers—national level | |
| 14 | Ukraine | 5 | 4 industry representatives 1 academic HPC representatives |
| No. | Group according to global competitiveness index (2018) | Country | No. of participants | Participants profiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Austria | 6 | 3 industry representatives | |
| 2 | Czech Republic | 6 | 3 industry representatives | |
| 3 | Germany (Baden-Württemberg) | 7 | 3 industry representatives | |
| 4 | Slovenia | 15 | 10 industry representatives | |
| 5 | Bulgaria | 6 | 2 industry representatives | |
| 6 | Hungary | 10 | 6 industry representatives | |
| 7 | Romania | 5 | 2 industry representatives | |
| 8 | Slovakia | 6 | 3 industry representatives | |
| 9 | Croatia | 5 | 3 industry representatives | |
| 10 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 4 | 2 industry representatives | |
| 11 | Moldova | 4 | 1 industry representative | |
| 12 | Montenegro | 3 | 2 industry representatives | |
| 13 | Serbia | 10 | 5 industry representatives | |
| 14 | Ukraine | 5 | 4 industry representatives |
Source(s): InnoHPC (2017), own grouping according to Schwab (2018)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.