Table 1

An overview of citizen-science projects' attributes from the realist literature review

Citizen-science attributesMechanismsMain outcomesMain references
CrowdsourcingWeb-based platforms and infrastructures to recruit and retain citizen scientists in professional-led research projects; limited degree of lay people involvement in the co-design of research activitiesTraining of machine learning technologies to foster big data analyticsKatapally et al. (2018), Meakin et al. (2019) 
Distributed intelligenceWeb-based platforms and mobile devices are concomitantly exploited to enable lay people to perform data collection and data analysis in a perspective of distributed inquiry; alongside hard mechanisms, some soft mechanisms are implemented to ensure lay people training and durable involvementCreative collective thinking and lay people increased awareness of health-related issuesKovacic et al. (2014), Lee et al. (2018) 
Participatory scienceWeb-based platforms and digital tools are primarily exploited to establish a co-creating relationship between lay people and expert scientists; soft mechanisms are significantly used to boost the establishment of fair exchanges between citizen scientists and expert scientistsInnovative idea generation and advancement of individual and collective health-related knowledgeDen Broeder et al. (2018), Katapally et al. (2020) 
Extreme citizen scienceWeb-based platforms gather lay people who led research initiatives that are intended to push forward scientific knowledge; soft mechanisms are primarily aimed at creating citizen scientists' motivation and engagement in citizen scienceEstablishment of a community-based and collaborative model of care based on personalized medicine and opennessKempner and Bailey (2019), Ashepet et al. (2021) 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal