Performances of nine Pareto solutions and a random non-Pareto solution
| Scenario | GHG/floor (kg CO2-e) | Duration/floor (day) | Cost/floor (CNY) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pareto #1 | 9808.72 | 8.848 | 195,057 |
| Pareto #2 | 8805.62 | 9.006 | 188,782 |
| Pareto #3 | 8789.67 | 9.167 | 189,569 |
| Pareto #4 | 9475.36 | 8.902 | 188,277 |
| Pareto #5 | 8628.37 | 9.110 | 197,143 |
| Pareto #6 | 9141.16 | 8.875 | 195,798 |
| Pareto #7 | 9473.65 | 8.865 | 198,978 |
| Pareto #8 | 8736.81 | 8.937 | 194,678 |
| Pareto #9 | 9746.46 | 9.065 | 187,970 |
| A non-Pareto solution | 10649.50 | 15.875 | 248,205 |
| GHG best scenario | Pareto #5 | – | – |
| Duration best scenario | – | Pareto #1 | – |
| Cost best scenario | – | – | Pareto #9 |
| Scenario | GHG/floor (kg CO2-e) | Duration/floor (day) | Cost/floor (CNY) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pareto #1 | 9808.72 | 8.848 | 195,057 |
| Pareto #2 | 8805.62 | 9.006 | 188,782 |
| Pareto #3 | 8789.67 | 9.167 | 189,569 |
| Pareto #4 | 9475.36 | 8.902 | 188,277 |
| Pareto #5 | 8628.37 | 9.110 | 197,143 |
| Pareto #6 | 9141.16 | 8.875 | 195,798 |
| Pareto #7 | 9473.65 | 8.865 | 198,978 |
| Pareto #8 | 8736.81 | 8.937 | 194,678 |
| Pareto #9 | 9746.46 | 9.065 | 187,970 |
| A non-Pareto solution | 10649.50 | 15.875 | 248,205 |
| GHG best scenario | Pareto #5 | – | – |
| Duration best scenario | – | Pareto #1 | – |
| Cost best scenario | – | – | Pareto #9 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.