Table I Nation-wide pro-poor growth... | Emerald Publishing

Table I

Nation-wide pro-poor growth index^a

	By poverty incidence			By poverty depth			By poverty severity
Period	η	δ	ϕ	η	δ	ϕ	η	δ	ϕ
2002–2003	−0.70	−0.58	1.20	−0.72	−0.85	0.85	−0.69	−0.79	0.87
2003–2004	−0.79	−0.81	0.97	−1.13	−1.17	0.97	−1.35	−1.38	0.98
2004–2005	−0.013	0.01	−1.25	−0.02	0.01	−1.63	−0.02	0.01	−1.91
2005–2006	−1.30	−1.06	1.23	−1.93	−1.52	1.27	−2.35	−1.85	1.27
2006–2007	−1.72	−1.26	1.37	−2.41	−1.74	1.38	−2.87	−2.07	1.39
2007–2008	−1.73	−1.30	1.33	−2.20	−1.74	1.27	−2.50	−1.92	1.30
2008–2009	−2.62	−1.75	1.49	−3.34	−2.26	1.48	−3.82	−2.56	1.49
2009–2010	−1.62	−1.15	1.41	−2.23	−1.46	1.53	−2.66	−1.89	1.41
2010–2011	−1.75	−1.30	1.35	−2.10	−1.62	1.30	−2.33	−1.75	1.34
2011–2012	−2.41	−1.70	1.42	−2.96	−2.06	1.43	−3.35	−2.38	1.41
2012–2013	−0.28	−0.20	1.40	−0.34	−0.24	1.42	−0.38	−0.28	1.38
2013–2014	−2.46	−1.88	1.31	−2.90	−2.21	1.31	−3.23	−2.50	1.29
2014–2015	−2.29	−1.76	1.30	−2.76	−2.05	1.34	−3.11	−2.45	1.27

	By poverty incidence			By poverty depth			By poverty severity
Period	η	δ	ϕ	η	δ	ϕ	η	δ	ϕ
2002–2003	−0.70	−0.58	1.20	−0.72	−0.85	0.85	−0.69	−0.79	0.87
2003–2004	−0.79	−0.81	0.97	−1.13	−1.17	0.97	−1.35	−1.38	0.98
2004–2005	−0.013	0.01	−1.25	−0.02	0.01	−1.63	−0.02	0.01	−1.91
2005–2006	−1.30	−1.06	1.23	−1.93	−1.52	1.27	−2.35	−1.85	1.27
2006–2007	−1.72	−1.26	1.37	−2.41	−1.74	1.38	−2.87	−2.07	1.39
2007–2008	−1.73	−1.30	1.33	−2.20	−1.74	1.27	−2.50	−1.92	1.30
2008–2009	−2.62	−1.75	1.49	−3.34	−2.26	1.48	−3.82	−2.56	1.49
2009–2010	−1.62	−1.15	1.41	−2.23	−1.46	1.53	−2.66	−1.89	1.41
2010–2011	−1.75	−1.30	1.35	−2.10	−1.62	1.30	−2.33	−1.75	1.34
2011–2012	−2.41	−1.70	1.42	−2.96	−2.06	1.43	−3.35	−2.38	1.41
2012–2013	−0.28	−0.20	1.40	−0.34	−0.24	1.42	−0.38	−0.28	1.38
2013–2014	−2.46	−1.88	1.31	−2.90	−2.21	1.31	−3.23	−2.50	1.29
2014–2015	−2.29	−1.76	1.30	−2.76	−2.05	1.34	−3.11	−2.45	1.27

Note: ^aFigures in the table are rounded, and refer to Kakwani and Pernia (2000) for the decomposition methodology of δ and ε