Summary of technology readiness level and digital skin characteristics of research studies
| Technology readiness level (TRL) | Classification of TRL and characteristics of digital skin of each study/article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-concept refinement or knowledge production | |||||
| (1) Basic principles of concept/scientific research | Khoury and Kamat (2009), evaluation (WLAN, UWB, GPS) | ||||
| (2) Formulation of technology concept and/or application | Fard and Peña-Mora (2007), scheduling (images) | ||||
| (3) Proof of concept | Hsieh et al. (2016), monitor processes (AR) | Kamat and Dong (2017), AR object mapping | Roberts et al. (1999), plant control (GPS) | CIOB (2017c), tracks material volumes | CIOB (2017a), wearable kit for safety |
| Edirisinghe, Blismas, Lingard, Dias and Wakefield (2014), non-invasive localisation (Wi-Fi) | Rebolj et al. (2008), activity tracking (images recognition) | Trimble (2017), mixed-reality applications | Navon and Kolton (2006), fall hazards (sensors and guardrail analysis) | Sacks et al. (2005), labour tracking (building models) | |
| Cheng and Chen (2002), monitor schedule (GIS, barcode, video) | GeoSLAM (2017), 3D mobile mapping technology with handheld scanners | Yi et al. (2016), evaluate perceived exertion (sensors) | MIT (2015), drones to capture progress | Golparvar-Fard et al. (2015), monitor processes (image) | |
| Jang and Skibniewski (2009), track assets (radio and ultrasound) | Dharwada et al. (2016), BIM-aware mobile app | Edirisinghe and Blismas (2015), monitor workers’ parameters (E-textiles) | Hudgens and McDermott (2009), hard hat tracks worker activities | Akinci et al. (2006), quality control (sensors and point cloud) | |
| Dasilva and Shervey (2012), safety management (RFID) | |||||
| Applied investigation | |||||
| (4) Functional validation in a laboratory environment or test bed or scenarios | Park et al. (2011), track resources (image processing) | Montaser and Moselhi (2014), track workers/material (RFID) | Riaz et al. (2014)c, visualise envi. temp. (Zigbee) | Moon et al. (2015), monitor safety (sensors) | |
| Zhang et al. (2015), workspace visualisation (BIM) | Irizarry et al. (2013), supply chain tracking (RFID) | Yeh et al. (2012), information retrieval (hardware and BIM) | Song et al. (2006), material tracking (RFID) | ||
| Maalek and Sadeghpour (2013), indoor resource tracking (UWB) | Yang et al. (2010), worker tracking (video, m/c learning) | Yang et al. (2012), tower crane activity tracking (video processing) | Bernold (1990), material management (barcodes) | ||
| Tajeen and Zhu (2014), equipment recognition (image processing) | Memarzadeh et al. (2013), workers and equipment detection (video streaming) | Khosrowpour et al. (2014), activity analysis (image processing) | Brilakis and Soibelman (2008), shape recognition (image processing) | ||
| (5) Prototype in a simulated environment/case study | Behzadan et al. (2008), context delivery (WLAN + GPS) | Cheng et al. (2012), ergonomic analysis (location, posture data) | Wang et al. (2014), visualisation (BIM, AR) | Goodrum et al. (2006), tool tracking (RFID) | |
| Cheng et al. (2011), resource tracking in hash environment (UWB) | Yeh et al. (2012), information retrieval (iPod, a projector, BIM) | Sacks, Navon, and Goldschmidt (2003), labour tracking | Retik and Shapira (1999), activity visualisation | ||
| Son and Kim (2010), monitor progress (vision-based) | Carbonari et al. (2011), position tracking (UWB + virtual fence) | Park & Kim (2013)b, safety management (BIM) | Heidari et al. (2014), real-time interaction (sensors + BIM) | Cheng et al. (2013), activity analysis (location, posture data) | |
| Teizer et al. (2013)d, safety training (tracking, visualisation) | Roh et al. (2011), progress monitoring (image analysis, BIM) | Lee et al. (2009), fall detection (IR and ultrasonic) | Ergen et al. (2007), track components (RFID and GPS) | ||
| Teizer et al. (2010), proximity – workers/equipment (RFID) | Jaselskis and Misalami (2003), material tracking (RFID) | Oloufa et al. (2003), collision tracking (GPS) | Wu et al. (2010), track near-misses (ultrasonic and RFID) | ||
| Development and operations | |||||
| (6) Qualified prototype demonstrating critical functionality in a relevant operational environment | Meža et al. (2014), AR task assisting (AR) | Pradhananga and Teizer (2013), track operations (GPS) | Kelm et al. (2013), monitor workers’ PPE compliance (RFID) | Chin et al. (2008), monitor progress (RFID, 4D CAD) | Cheng and Teizer (2013), monitor activities (images) |
| DAQRI (2017), AR smart helmet | Woo et al. (2011), track indoor workers (RFID) | ||||
| Lee et al. (2012),a positioning tower crane (BIM) | Jiang et al. (2015), labour consumption (GPS) | Costin et al. (2012),e monitor status (RFID) | RFID Journal (2013b), automate safety and access management | Teizer and Cheng (2015), hazard identification (UWB and GPS) | |
| RFID Journal (2012),a components tracking | RFID Journal (2009), equipment tracking | RFID Journal (2010), track offshore equipment | RFID Journal (2013a), track prefabricated units | ||
| (7) Full, scaled-up system demonstration (pre-product with all requirements) in an appropriate generalisation of real or operational environment | Eskobionics (2017), upper body exoskeleton minimising exposure to muscle strain and injury | ||||
| Industrial product | |||||
| (8) General product or technology completed and qualified through tests | Dalux (2017), AR-based mobile app | IkeGPS (2016), mobile app-based laser rangefinder | |||
| (9) Industrial technology proven through successful deployment in an operational setting | RFID Journal (2011), hard hats to track workers | SmartCap (2017), fatigue monitoring hard hat | |||
| Technology readiness level (TRL) | Classification of TRL and characteristics of digital skin of each study/article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Basic principles of concept/scientific research | |||||
| (2) Formulation of technology concept and/or application | |||||
| (3) Proof of concept | |||||
| Jang and Skibniewski (2009), track assets (radio and ultrasound) | |||||
| (4) Functional validation in a laboratory environment or test bed or scenarios | |||||
| (5) Prototype in a simulated environment/case study | |||||
| Jaselskis and Misalami (2003), material tracking (RFID) | |||||
| (6) Qualified prototype demonstrating critical functionality in a relevant operational environment | |||||
| Woo | |||||
| (7) Full, scaled-up system demonstration (pre-product with all requirements) in an appropriate generalisation of real or operational environment | |||||
| (8) General product or technology completed and qualified through tests | |||||
| (9) Industrial technology proven through successful deployment in an operational setting | |||||
Notes: aLee et al. (2012) and RFID Journal (2012) evaluated technology acceptance. Lee et al. (2012) used TAM to evaluate; bPark and Kim (2013) evaluated a prototype through different stakeholders; cRiaz et al. (2014) sought feedback in a focus group; dTeizer et al. (2013) surveyed participants; eCostin et al. (2012) conducted a brief evaluation, but not a systematic one
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.