Table 1

Intercoder reliability checklist

Aspects of intercoder reliabilityPresentJustification (if “no”)
There was a minimum of two codersYes 
At least one coder was more removed from data collection (to address bias)Yes 
At least one coder had the expertise and previous experience with coding qualitative dataYes 
If there were multiple participant groups, a minimum of two researchers (coders) coded transcripts from each participant groupYes 
The coders used the same framework for analysis (e.g. inductive, deductive, abductive)Yes 
Coders focused on the shared meaning of *codes through dialogue and consensusYes 
Another coder with expertise in qualitative methods was consulted to resolve outstanding conflictsNoNo unresolved conflicts with the coding frame occurred
Coder consensus resulted in a codebook** that was applied when coding the remaining transcriptsYes 

Note(s): *The code names do not have to be identical, but the meaning of the codes must be the same

**In inductive and abductive analyses, coding can be an iterative process; therefore, new codes may be added to the codebook until code saturation is reached

Source(s): Adapted from Cofie et al. (2022) 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal