Study classification accuracy comparison
| Comparison of overall classification accuracy between studies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data | Boekestein (2015) | Shallcross (2016) | Leiby (2017) | New COCOM models |
| Overall World Results (Training Data) | 86.63% | 88.76% | 91.99% | 92.69% |
| Overall World Results (Validation Data) | 78.30% | 84.67% | 82.56% | 87.08% |
| Comparison of overall classification accuracy between studies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data | New COCOM models | |||
| Overall World Results (Training Data) | 86.63% | 88.76% | 91.99% | |
| Overall World Results (Validation Data) | 78.30% | 84.67% | 82.56% | |
Note(s): The best accuracy values are indicated with italics
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.