Table 1

Analysis process

Interpretative repertoirePhase 1: Tracing recurring discursive elements (themes, vocabularies) to identify interpretative repertoiresPhase 2: Examining argumentation related to the recurring themesPhase 3: Interpreting the repertoire's functions and socio-cultural linkages
1. Discursive move: rejecting “excessive” feminismNegative projections of claiming equality for the sake of equality and Black-and-White argumentationUsing modality to condemn particular actionsPortraying dominant gender inequality debate as remote and repudiating structural discrimination
Distancing through emotional reactions (frustration, exhaustion)
Pejorative descriptions (“ridiculous,” “fuss”)
2. Discursive move: articulating self-reliant professional futuresAchieved through polarity: Eliciting negative views of women's victimization, blaming men, complaining, playing “martyr”Speaking for oneself and on behalf of other womenDistancing from potentially harmful “victim” identities and arguing for women's responsibility
Using modality to encourage particular actions
Embedded in the Nordic strong women discourse and reliance on equal opportunity
Using disclaimers and emphasizing one's opinion and experience (“in my opinion,” “from the people I know”)
Articulating beliefs in self-reliance, confidence, determination, and choice as key constituents in women's careers
Using modality to condemn particular actions
Distancing through emotional reactions (frustration)
3. Discursive move: producing idealized role modelsIdealized femininity built from attributes and behaviors that integrate strength, confidence, gutsiness, self-reliance and energy with calmness, maternalism and beautyUsing superlatives to idealize the role modelSurvival in the neoliberal society depends on one's ability to “balance right” in the masculine profession

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal