Analysis process
| Interpretative repertoire | Phase 1: Tracing recurring discursive elements (themes, vocabularies) to identify interpretative repertoires | Phase 2: Examining argumentation related to the recurring themes | Phase 3: Interpreting the repertoire's functions and socio-cultural linkages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Discursive move: rejecting “excessive” feminism | Negative projections of claiming equality for the sake of equality and Black-and-White argumentation | Using modality to condemn particular actions | Portraying dominant gender inequality debate as remote and repudiating structural discrimination |
| Distancing through emotional reactions (frustration, exhaustion) | |||
| Pejorative descriptions (“ridiculous,” “fuss”) | |||
| 2. Discursive move: articulating self-reliant professional futures | Achieved through polarity: Eliciting negative views of women's victimization, blaming men, complaining, playing “martyr” | Speaking for oneself and on behalf of other women | Distancing from potentially harmful “victim” identities and arguing for women's responsibility |
| Using modality to encourage particular actions | |||
| Embedded in the Nordic strong women discourse and reliance on equal opportunity | |||
| Using disclaimers and emphasizing one's opinion and experience (“in my opinion,” “from the people I know”) | |||
| Articulating beliefs in self-reliance, confidence, determination, and choice as key constituents in women's careers | |||
| Using modality to condemn particular actions | |||
| Distancing through emotional reactions (frustration) | |||
| 3. Discursive move: producing idealized role models | Idealized femininity built from attributes and behaviors that integrate strength, confidence, gutsiness, self-reliance and energy with calmness, maternalism and beauty | Using superlatives to idealize the role model | Survival in the neoliberal society depends on one's ability to “balance right” in the masculine profession |
| Interpretative repertoire | Phase 1: Tracing recurring discursive elements (themes, vocabularies) to identify interpretative repertoires | Phase 2: Examining argumentation related to the recurring themes | Phase 3: Interpreting the repertoire's functions and socio-cultural linkages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Discursive move: rejecting “excessive” feminism | Negative projections of claiming equality for the sake of equality and Black-and-White argumentation | Using modality to condemn particular actions | Portraying dominant gender inequality debate as remote and repudiating structural discrimination |
| Distancing through emotional reactions (frustration, exhaustion) | |||
| Pejorative descriptions (“ridiculous,” “fuss”) | |||
| 2. Discursive move: articulating self-reliant professional futures | Achieved through polarity: Eliciting negative views of women's victimization, blaming men, complaining, playing “martyr” | Speaking for oneself and on behalf of other women | Distancing from potentially harmful “victim” identities and arguing for women's responsibility |
| Using modality to encourage particular actions | |||
| Embedded in the Nordic strong women discourse and reliance on equal opportunity | |||
| Using disclaimers and emphasizing one's opinion and experience (“in my opinion,” “from the people I know”) | |||
| Articulating beliefs in self-reliance, confidence, determination, and choice as key constituents in women's careers | |||
| Using modality to condemn particular actions | |||
| Distancing through emotional reactions (frustration) | |||
| 3. Discursive move: producing idealized role models | Idealized femininity built from attributes and behaviors that integrate strength, confidence, gutsiness, self-reliance and energy with calmness, maternalism and beauty | Using superlatives to idealize the role model | Survival in the neoliberal society depends on one's ability to “balance right” in the masculine profession |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.