Table 3 Structural model: results R 2 JS...

Table 3

Structural model: results

			R² _JS = 0.514
			R² _WFC = 0.066
			R² _WFE = 0.069
					Bootstrap percentile
Relationships			β	t value	95% CI		f²	Variance accounted for	VIF	Supported
Relationships			β	t value	Lowest	Highest	f²	Variance accounted for	VIF	Supported
Hypothesis		Direct effects
H1	+	USOB → JS	0.140***	5.470	0.097	0.181	0.036	4.62%	1.128	Yes
		USOB → WFC	−0.235***	7.760	−0.284	−0.186	0.057	5.41%	1.042
		USOB → WFE	0.240***	8.155	0.192	0.287	0.059	6.00%	1.042
		WFC → JS	−0.132***	4.582	−0.179	−0.086	0.028	5.45%	1.270
		WFE → JS	0.588***	22.077	0.543	0.631	0.558	40.27%	1.274
Control variables
Gender → WFC			0.014	0.440	−0.039	0.068	0.0002	0.05%
Gender → WFE			0.023	0.750	−0.028	0.073	0.001	−0.02%
Gender → JS			−0.039	1.593	−0.079	0.00002	0.003	0.26%
Spouse or partner → WFC			−0.076**	2.344	−0.130	−0.023	0.006	0.62%
Spouse or partner → WFE			0.008	0.250	−0.046	0.060	0.0001	0.04%
Spouse or partner → JS			0.009	0.389	−0.031	0.050	0.0002	0.08%
Dependent children → WFC			0.105***	3.216	0.051	0.158	0.011	0.48%
Dependent children → WFE			0.059*	1.813	0.006	0.113	0.003	0.57%
Dependent children → JS			0.036	1.436	−0.006	0.076	0.002	0.42%
Dependent adults → WFC			−0.009	0.274	−0.060	0.043	0.0001	0.01%
Dependent adults → WFE			0.045	1.459	−0.006	0.096	0.002	0.28%
Dependent adults → JS			0.032	1.368	−0.007	0.070	0.002	0.26%

			R² _JS = 0.514
			R² _WFC = 0.066
			R² _WFE = 0.069
					Bootstrap percentile
Relationships			β	t value	95% CI		f²	Variance accounted for	VIF	Supported
Relationships			β	t value	Lowest	Highest	f²	Variance accounted for	VIF	Supported
Hypothesis		Direct effects
H1	+	USOB → JS	0.140***	5.470	0.097	0.181	0.036	4.62%	1.128	Yes
		USOB → WFC	−0.235***	7.760	−0.284	−0.186	0.057	5.41%	1.042
		USOB → WFE	0.240***	8.155	0.192	0.287	0.059	6.00%	1.042
		WFC → JS	−0.132***	4.582	−0.179	−0.086	0.028	5.45%	1.270
		WFE → JS	0.588***	22.077	0.543	0.631	0.558	40.27%	1.274
Control variables
Gender → WFC			0.014	0.440	−0.039	0.068	0.0002	0.05%
Gender → WFE			0.023	0.750	−0.028	0.073	0.001	−0.02%
Gender → JS			−0.039	1.593	−0.079	0.00002	0.003	0.26%
Spouse or partner → WFC			−0.076**	2.344	−0.130	−0.023	0.006	0.62%
Spouse or partner → WFE			0.008	0.250	−0.046	0.060	0.0001	0.04%
Spouse or partner → JS			0.009	0.389	−0.031	0.050	0.0002	0.08%
Dependent children → WFC			0.105***	3.216	0.051	0.158	0.011	0.48%
Dependent children → WFE			0.059*	1.813	0.006	0.113	0.003	0.57%
Dependent children → JS			0.036	1.436	−0.006	0.076	0.002	0.42%
Dependent adults → WFC			−0.009	0.274	−0.060	0.043	0.0001	0.01%
Dependent adults → WFE			0.045	1.459	−0.006	0.096	0.002	0.28%
Dependent adults → JS			0.032	1.368	−0.007	0.070	0.002	0.26%

Note(s): USOB: Use of work–life benefits and policies (WLBPs); WFC: work-to-family conflict; WFE: work-to-family enrichment; and JS: job satisfaction. β: coefficient; and CI: confidence interval. f ²: effect size. Variance accounted for = β * correlation

t value for 5,000 bootstrapping subsamples: (based on a distribution t (4,999) of one-tailed student). t (0.05; 4,999) = 1.645; t (0.01; 4,999) = 2.327; and t (0.001; 4,999) = 3.092. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable