Table 2. Results of confirmatory factor...

Table 2.

Results of confirmatory factor analyzes of study measures

Model	χ²	df	Δχ²	Δdf	CFI	RMSEA	SRMR
Model 1 (hypothesized five-factor model)	377.11**	199	–	–	0.971	0.034	0.044
Model 2 (four-factor model: combines HW and EW)	580.16**	205	203.05**	6	0.865	0.081	0.110
Model 3 (three-factor model: combines HW, EW and AC)	686.10**	207	308.99**	8	0.780	0.101	0.117
Model 4 (one-factor model)	937.88**	210	560.77**	11	0.642	0.136	0.122

Model	χ²	df	Δχ²	Δdf	CFI	RMSEA	SRMR
Model 1 (hypothesized five-factor model)	377.11**	199	–	–	0.971	0.034	0.044
Model 2 (four-factor model: combines HW and EW)	580.16**	205	203.05**	6	0.865	0.081	0.110
Model 3 (three-factor model: combines HW, EW and AC)	686.10**	207	308.99**	8	0.780	0.101	0.117
Model 4 (one-factor model)	937.88**	210	560.77**	11	0.642	0.136	0.122

Notes:

N = 280. HW = hedonic well-being, EW = eudaimonic well-being, AC = affective commitment, JP = job performance; χ² = chi-square, df = degree of freedom, RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation, CFI = comparative fit index, SRMR = standardized root mean square residual.

p < 0.01

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable