Differences in KE meeting process quality before and after training
| Group no | Total squared jump value | Average expert KE process quality rating (SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting 1 | Meeting 2 | Δ | Meeting 1 | Meeting 2 | Δ | |
| 1 | 85 | 185 | 100 | 4.56 (0.96) | 3.89 (0.87) | −0.66 |
| 2 | 80 | 9 | −81 | 7.33 (1.05) | 6.83 (0.67) | −0.50 |
| 3 | 110 | 41 | −69 | 5.61 (1.20) | 6.39 (1.56) | 0.78 |
| 4 | 167 | 44 | −123 | 4.89 (1.10) | 7.67 (1.05) | 2.78 |
| 5 | 152 | 40 | −112 | 4.22 (0.79) | 7.28 (0.79) | 3.06 |
| 6 | 66 | 22 | −44 | 6.39 (1.20) | 7.78 (1.00) | 1.39 |
| 7 | 24 | 30 | 6 | 4.67 (0.82) | 7.50 (1.00) | 2.87 |
| 8 | 77 | 77 | 0 | 5.00 (1.33) | 5.78 (1.13) | 0.78 |
| 9 | 53 | 96 | 43 | 5.72 (1.13) | 3.44 (1.50) | −2.28 |
| 10 | 65 | 86 | 21 | 8.00 (1.08) | 7.39 (1.15) | −0.61 |
| Group no | Total squared jump value | Average expert KE process quality rating (SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting 1 | Meeting 2 | Δ | Meeting 1 | Meeting 2 | Δ | |
| 1 | 85 | 185 | 100 | 4.56 (0.96) | 3.89 (0.87) | −0.66 |
| 2 | 80 | 9 | −81 | 7.33 (1.05) | 6.83 (0.67) | −0.50 |
| 3 | 110 | 41 | −69 | 5.61 (1.20) | 6.39 (1.56) | 0.78 |
| 4 | 167 | 44 | −123 | 4.89 (1.10) | 7.67 (1.05) | 2.78 |
| 5 | 152 | 40 | −112 | 4.22 (0.79) | 7.28 (0.79) | 3.06 |
| 6 | 66 | 22 | −44 | 6.39 (1.20) | 7.78 (1.00) | 1.39 |
| 7 | 24 | 30 | 6 | 4.67 (0.82) | 7.50 (1.00) | 2.87 |
| 8 | 77 | 77 | 0 | 5.00 (1.33) | 5.78 (1.13) | 0.78 |
| 9 | 53 | 96 | 43 | 5.72 (1.13) | 3.44 (1.50) | −2.28 |
| 10 | 65 | 86 | 21 | 8.00 (1.08) | 7.39 (1.15) | −0.61 |
Note(s): Average expert KE process quality rating scale 1 = very bad to 10 = excellent. SD = Standard deviation. Δ = difference between meeting 1 and meeting 2. For comparison reasons video 21, being the third meeting of the group 10, was left out
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.