Differences in KE meeting process quality before and after training
| Group no | Total squared jump value | Average expert KE process quality rating (SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting 1 | Meeting 2 | Δ | Meeting 1 | Meeting 2 | Δ | |
| 1 | 85 | 185 | 100 | 4.56 (0.96) | 3.89 (0.87) | −0.66 |
| 2 | 80 | 9 | −81 | 7.33 (1.05) | 6.83 (0.67) | −0.50 |
| 3 | 110 | 41 | −69 | 5.61 (1.20) | 6.39 (1.56) | 0.78 |
| 4 | 167 | 44 | −123 | 4.89 (1.10) | 7.67 (1.05) | 2.78 |
| 5 | 152 | 40 | −112 | 4.22 (0.79) | 7.28 (0.79) | 3.06 |
| 6 | 66 | 22 | −44 | 6.39 (1.20) | 7.78 (1.00) | 1.39 |
| 7 | 24 | 30 | 6 | 4.67 (0.82) | 7.50 (1.00) | 2.87 |
| 8 | 77 | 77 | 0 | 5.00 (1.33) | 5.78 (1.13) | 0.78 |
| 9 | 53 | 96 | 43 | 5.72 (1.13) | 3.44 (1.50) | −2.28 |
| 10 | 65 | 86 | 21 | 8.00 (1.08) | 7.39 (1.15) | −0.61 |
| Group no | Total squared jump value | Average expert KE process quality rating (SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting 1 | Meeting 2 | Δ | Meeting 1 | Meeting 2 | Δ | |
| 1 | 85 | 185 | 100 | 4.56 (0.96) | 3.89 (0.87) | −0.66 |
| 2 | 80 | 9 | −81 | 7.33 (1.05) | 6.83 (0.67) | −0.50 |
| 3 | 110 | 41 | −69 | 5.61 (1.20) | 6.39 (1.56) | 0.78 |
| 4 | 167 | 44 | −123 | 4.89 (1.10) | 7.67 (1.05) | 2.78 |
| 5 | 152 | 40 | −112 | 4.22 (0.79) | 7.28 (0.79) | 3.06 |
| 6 | 66 | 22 | −44 | 6.39 (1.20) | 7.78 (1.00) | 1.39 |
| 7 | 24 | 30 | 6 | 4.67 (0.82) | 7.50 (1.00) | 2.87 |
| 8 | 77 | 77 | 0 | 5.00 (1.33) | 5.78 (1.13) | 0.78 |
| 9 | 53 | 96 | 43 | 5.72 (1.13) | 3.44 (1.50) | −2.28 |
| 10 | 65 | 86 | 21 | 8.00 (1.08) | 7.39 (1.15) | −0.61 |
Note(s): Average expert KE process quality rating scale 1 = very bad to 10 = excellent. SD = Standard deviation. Δ = difference between meeting 1 and meeting 2. For comparison reasons video 21, being the third meeting of the group 10, was left out