Table 3 Results of nested model...

Table 3

Results of nested model comparisons

Model		χ²	df	χ/df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	SRMR	χ² test difference
1	Baseline: 6-factor model (PP, CL, FR, Hope, GC, GS)	453.895	260	1.746	0.922	0.910	0.048	0.051	Preferred Model
2	5-factor model (PP, CL + FR, Hope, GC, GS)	707.634	265	2.67	0.822	0.798	0.072	0.080	Δχ²(5) = 253.74 ***
3	4-factor model (PP, CL + FR + Hope, GC, GS)	989.636	269	3.679	0.710	0.677	0.091	0.082	Δχ² (9) = 535.74 ***
4	3-factor model (PP, CL + FR + Hope + GC, GS)	1164.901	272	4.283	0.641	0.604	0.101	0.092	Δχ² (12) = 711.01 ***
5	2-factor model (PP, CL + FR + Hope + GC + GS)	1301.114	274	4.749	0.587	0.547	0.108	0.097	Δχ² (14) = 847.22 ***
6	1-factor model (PP + CL + FR + Hope + GC + GS)	1514.408	275	5.507	0.501	0.456	0.118	0.103	Δχ²(15) = 1060.50 ***

Model		χ²	df	χ/df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	SRMR	χ² test difference
1	Baseline: 6-factor model (PP, CL, FR, Hope, GC, GS)	453.895	260	1.746	0.922	0.910	0.048	0.051	Preferred Model
2	5-factor model (PP, CL + FR, Hope, GC, GS)	707.634	265	2.67	0.822	0.798	0.072	0.080	Δχ²(5) = 253.74 ***
3	4-factor model (PP, CL + FR + Hope, GC, GS)	989.636	269	3.679	0.710	0.677	0.091	0.082	Δχ² (9) = 535.74 ***
4	3-factor model (PP, CL + FR + Hope + GC, GS)	1164.901	272	4.283	0.641	0.604	0.101	0.092	Δχ² (12) = 711.01 ***
5	2-factor model (PP, CL + FR + Hope + GC + GS)	1301.114	274	4.749	0.587	0.547	0.108	0.097	Δχ² (14) = 847.22 ***
6	1-factor model (PP + CL + FR + Hope + GC + GS)	1514.408	275	5.507	0.501	0.456	0.118	0.103	Δχ²(15) = 1060.50 ***

Note(s): PP = Project Performance; CL = Collaborative Project Leadership; FR = Financial Project Resources; Hope = Project Workers’ Hope; GS = Project Workers’ Goal Stress; GC = Project Workers’ Goal Commitment. ***p < 0.001

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable