Results of the evaluation
| Evaluation aspect | Evaluation results |
|---|---|
| Strategic goals |
|
| Performance measurement |
|
| Evaluation aspect | Evaluation results |
|---|---|
| Strategic goals | The percentage of totally isolated service units that have no shared goals with other service units: 0% Five goals were boundary object between all the service units (45.5%) The percentage of nonexistent dyadic relationships: 0% On average, eight goals connected one service unit to another in the hybrid The c-coefficient values were between 0.55 and 1 indicating rather good coherence in PM |
| Performance measurement | The percentage of totally isolated service units that have no performance measures with other service units: 0% Two of the measures were boundary object between all the service units (16.6%) The percentage of nonexistent dyadic relationships: 0% The average number of performance measures that connect any two service units together was 5 The c-coefficient values were between 0.18 and 1, indicating low level of fragmentation in PM |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.