Internalisation and contingent variables: means comparison
| Contingent variable | Groups | Intern mean | Groups showing significant differences |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size of organisation | Group 1: small | 4.16 | |
| Group 2: medium | 4.13 | ||
| Group 3: large | 4.16 | ||
| Time since adoption | Group 1: ⩽3 years | 4.06** | (1–2)** |
| Group 2: >3 years | 4.23** | ||
| Level of Excellence | Group 1: recognition 500+ | 4.41** | (1–4)** |
| Group 2: recognition 400+ | 4.27 | ||
| Group 3: recognition 300+ | 4.20 | ||
| Group 4: recognition 200+ | 4.04** |
| Contingent variable | Groups | Intern mean | Groups showing significant differences |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size of organisation | Group 1: small | 4.16 | |
| Group 2: medium | 4.13 | ||
| Group 3: large | 4.16 | ||
| Time since adoption | Group 1: ⩽3 years | 4.06** | (1–2)** |
| Group 2: >3 years | 4.23** | ||
| Level of Excellence | Group 1: recognition 500+ | 4.41** | (1–4)** |
| Group 2: recognition 400+ | 4.27 | ||
| Group 3: recognition 300+ | 4.20 | ||
| Group 4: recognition 200+ | 4.04** |
Note: **p<0.05
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.