Table AII Risk factors in environment... | Emerald Publishing

Table AII

Risk factors in environment aspect

Value	Environment
Value	Occurrence	Severity	Detection	Control	Information	Range
1	It is almost impossible	No effect: the effect is unverifiable, change is not sensible	Sense perception is directly and immediately possible by anyone, at any time of the day	It does not require any regulation, spontaneously regularized	No information is required	Nobody is involved
2	Annually	Neutral: the effect is verifiable, but the caused change is not sensible	Sense perception is directly and immediately possible by anyone, but only in smooth atmospheric/optical/noise conditions (e.g. only in daytime)	Open-loop (nonfeedback) control is enough	All the information is available to know the failure modes and effects	Max. 1 person is involved in the factory, max. 1 day is the correction
3	Quarterly	Tolerable: unwanted changes can be detected, but they do not affect any essential features of the given unit	Especially difficult to detect sensory, even in daytime, under optimal conditions	Only local control, easily controllable using feedback	The failure modes and effects are known, but not all the information about effects given in advance, but can be acquired after the occurrence	2 or 3 people are involved in the factory, or 4–5 days is the correction
4	Once a month	Acceptable as tolerated status: unwanted changes can be detected, they do affect more essential features of the given unit	Sense perception is possible only using tool (e.g. light, the use of contrast agents, the use of indicators, etc.)	requires local forecast, feed-forward control	The failure modes and effects are known, but not all the information about the effects is given in advance and also cannot be obtained after the occurrence	4 or 5 people are involved in the company, or 4–7 days is the correction
5	Several times a month	Annoying: functions are sustainable, but conditions are deteriorating	Sense perception is not possible; however, the change is demonstrable mathematically (calculation, inventory, mass balance, etc.)	Higher-level control, easily controllable using feedback	The failure modes are known, but not all the effects, or not all information about the effects is given in advance, but can be obtained after the occurrence	Min. 6 people are involved in the company, 7-10 days is the correction
6	Once a week	Little problem: the irreversibility described above exists; however, the change is not over limit or qualification barrier, or the change is over limit, but the effect is reversible without any corrective action	Immediately can be detected by instruments in own ownership and use	Requires forecast from higher level, feed-forward control	The failure modes are known, but not all the effects, or not all information about the effects is given in advance, and can be only estimated after the occurrence	Impact on the total internal operation of the company but can be corrected internally
7	Several times a week	Problem: irreversibility exists, the change is over one limit or qualification barrier, the effect is reversible without any corrective action	Immediately can be detected by instruments from external source	Requires forecast from higher level, feed-forward control, but only partially effective	Failure modes are nor known folly and effects can be estimated only partly	Widespread involvement within the company, one business partner is involved
8	Once a day	Restrictive: the change is over each limit, regulation and so on, as a consequence the unit gets into lower quality class, but the change is reversible	Not all parameters can be detected using in-situ procedure	It requires the use of multiple control tools for multiple levels, but only partially effective	There is no information about failure modes and effects in advance, but can be obtained after occurrence	Widespread involvement within the company, more business partners are involved, environmental damage in max. 50 m radius
9	Several times a day	Harmful: the change is over each limit, regulation and so on, as a consequence the unit gets into lower quality class, the change is irreversible	Can be detected only based on sampling, in laboratory conditions	There is no influence, not controllable	There is no information about failure modes and effects in advance, and they can be obtained after occurrence only in part	Widespread involvement among the business partners, social environment and inside the company, environmental damage in 50200 m radius
10	Per shift	Terminating: the unit or the whole system ceases to exist or loses determinating features	Instrumental analytical tests cannot detect (or close to error limit), at most generation changes can be detected	There is no influence, going to unfavorable direction	There is no and cannot be obtained information about failure modes and effects	Widespread involvement among the business partners, social environment and inside the company, large publicity, environmental damage is in over 200 m radius

Value	Environment
Value	Occurrence	Severity	Detection	Control	Information	Range
1	It is almost impossible	No effect: the effect is unverifiable, change is not sensible	Sense perception is directly and immediately possible by anyone, at any time of the day	It does not require any regulation, spontaneously regularized	No information is required	Nobody is involved
2	Annually	Neutral: the effect is verifiable, but the caused change is not sensible	Sense perception is directly and immediately possible by anyone, but only in smooth atmospheric/optical/noise conditions (e.g. only in daytime)	Open-loop (nonfeedback) control is enough	All the information is available to know the failure modes and effects	Max. 1 person is involved in the factory, max. 1 day is the correction
3	Quarterly	Tolerable: unwanted changes can be detected, but they do not affect any essential features of the given unit	Especially difficult to detect sensory, even in daytime, under optimal conditions	Only local control, easily controllable using feedback	The failure modes and effects are known, but not all the information about effects given in advance, but can be acquired after the occurrence	2 or 3 people are involved in the factory, or 4–5 days is the correction
4	Once a month	Acceptable as tolerated status: unwanted changes can be detected, they do affect more essential features of the given unit	Sense perception is possible only using tool (e.g. light, the use of contrast agents, the use of indicators, etc.)	requires local forecast, feed-forward control	The failure modes and effects are known, but not all the information about the effects is given in advance and also cannot be obtained after the occurrence	4 or 5 people are involved in the company, or 4–7 days is the correction
5	Several times a month	Annoying: functions are sustainable, but conditions are deteriorating	Sense perception is not possible; however, the change is demonstrable mathematically (calculation, inventory, mass balance, etc.)	Higher-level control, easily controllable using feedback	The failure modes are known, but not all the effects, or not all information about the effects is given in advance, but can be obtained after the occurrence	Min. 6 people are involved in the company, 7-10 days is the correction
6	Once a week	Little problem: the irreversibility described above exists; however, the change is not over limit or qualification barrier, or the change is over limit, but the effect is reversible without any corrective action	Immediately can be detected by instruments in own ownership and use	Requires forecast from higher level, feed-forward control	The failure modes are known, but not all the effects, or not all information about the effects is given in advance, and can be only estimated after the occurrence	Impact on the total internal operation of the company but can be corrected internally
7	Several times a week	Problem: irreversibility exists, the change is over one limit or qualification barrier, the effect is reversible without any corrective action	Immediately can be detected by instruments from external source	Requires forecast from higher level, feed-forward control, but only partially effective	Failure modes are nor known folly and effects can be estimated only partly	Widespread involvement within the company, one business partner is involved
8	Once a day	Restrictive: the change is over each limit, regulation and so on, as a consequence the unit gets into lower quality class, but the change is reversible	Not all parameters can be detected using in-situ procedure	It requires the use of multiple control tools for multiple levels, but only partially effective	There is no information about failure modes and effects in advance, but can be obtained after occurrence	Widespread involvement within the company, more business partners are involved, environmental damage in max. 50 m radius
9	Several times a day	Harmful: the change is over each limit, regulation and so on, as a consequence the unit gets into lower quality class, the change is irreversible	Can be detected only based on sampling, in laboratory conditions	There is no influence, not controllable	There is no information about failure modes and effects in advance, and they can be obtained after occurrence only in part	Widespread involvement among the business partners, social environment and inside the company, environmental damage in 50200 m radius
10	Per shift	Terminating: the unit or the whole system ceases to exist or loses determinating features	Instrumental analytical tests cannot detect (or close to error limit), at most generation changes can be detected	There is no influence, going to unfavorable direction	There is no and cannot be obtained information about failure modes and effects	Widespread involvement among the business partners, social environment and inside the company, large publicity, environmental damage is in over 200 m radius