Literature review on PIQ
| Research stream | Author | Looks at | Dimensions | Description | Example | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Service Failure | Holloway und Beatty (2003) | Website design problems | Navigational problems at site | Web site failed to function | Set up is confusing | Mixed |
| Product poorly presented at site | satisfactorily | Loading is too slow | ||||
| Insufficient information provided at site | No information on order process | |||||
| Products incorrectly listed at site | Product placement inappropriate | |||||
| Forbes et al. (2005) | Response to service delivery system/product failure | Bad information | Information provided was insufficient | Consumer expecting certain capabilities, but the product did not have | Qualitative | |
| those capabilities | ||||||
| Tan et al. (2016) | Information failure | Inaccurate Information | Information provided hinders | Information is unbiased | Qualitative | |
| Incomplete Information | Consumers in accomplishing their transactional activities | Missing company policies | ||||
| Irrelevant Information | Hidden charges | |||||
| Untimely Information | Information is not up-to-date | |||||
| Roy et al. (2022) | Website Design Problems | Navigational problems at the site | Failures of the website system | System failure | Quantitative | |
| Product poorly presented or misrepresented at the site | Confusing navigation | |||||
| Insufficient information provided at site | Lack of information on order procedure | |||||
| Products incorrectly listed as in stock | ||||||
| Incorrect information provided at the site | ||||||
| Web site system failure | ||||||
| E-Service Quality | Loiacono et al. (2002) | Website quality | Information usefulness | Delivered information helps to conduct task | Information provided meets customers information needs | Mixed |
| Information ease of use | Delivered Information is designed pretty | Website pages are easy to read | ||||
| Visual appeal | ||||||
| Parasuraman et al. (2005) | E-S-QUAL | Information efficiency | Rating of websites performance in view of website information | Information is easy to find, well organized | Mixed | |
| PIQ | Current work | Product information quality | Visual product depiction | Retailer provides inferior PIQ | Product depiction is incomplete (Pictures/Video) | Quantitative |
| Product information | Too long product title | |||||
| Product details | Bad title readability | |||||
| Product attributes | Product attributes are inconsistent |
| Research stream | Author | Looks at | Dimensions | Description | Example | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Service Failure | Website design problems | Navigational problems at site | Web site failed to function | Set up is confusing | Mixed | |
| Product poorly presented at site | satisfactorily | Loading is too slow | ||||
| Insufficient information provided at site | No information on order process | |||||
| Products incorrectly listed at site | Product placement inappropriate | |||||
| Response to service delivery system/product failure | Bad information | Information provided was insufficient | Consumer expecting certain capabilities, but the product did not have | Qualitative | ||
| those capabilities | ||||||
| Information failure | Inaccurate Information | Information provided hinders | Information is unbiased | Qualitative | ||
| Incomplete Information | Consumers in accomplishing their transactional activities | Missing company policies | ||||
| Irrelevant Information | Hidden charges | |||||
| Untimely Information | Information is not up-to-date | |||||
| Website Design Problems | Navigational problems at the site | Failures of the website system | System failure | Quantitative | ||
| Product poorly presented or misrepresented at the site | Confusing navigation | |||||
| Insufficient information provided at site | Lack of information on order procedure | |||||
| Products incorrectly listed as in stock | ||||||
| Incorrect information provided at the site | ||||||
| Web site system failure | ||||||
| E-Service Quality | Website quality | Information usefulness | Delivered information helps to conduct task | Information provided meets customers information needs | Mixed | |
| Information ease of use | Delivered Information is designed pretty | Website pages are easy to read | ||||
| Visual appeal | ||||||
| E-S-QUAL | Information efficiency | Rating of websites performance in view of website information | Information is easy to find, well organized | Mixed | ||
| PIQ | Current work | Product information quality | Visual product depiction | Retailer provides inferior PIQ | Product depiction is incomplete (Pictures/Video) | Quantitative |
| Product information | Too long product title | |||||
| Product details | Bad title readability | |||||
| Product attributes | Product attributes are inconsistent |
Source(s): Table by author
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.