Table 3 Assessing the formative... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Assessing the formative measurement models

Formative indicator → latent variable	Original sample	Sample mean	SD	T-statistics	p-value	VIF
UX_Explicit Perspicuity → Explicit pragmatic UX	0.226	0.225	0.089	2.533	0.011	1.585
UX_Explicit Efficiency → Explicit pragmatic UX	0.850	0.848	0.064	13.274	0.000	1.488
UX_Explicit Dependability → Explicit pragmatic UX	0.019	0.015	0.065	0.289	0.773	1.084
UX_Explicit Stimulation → Explicit hedonic UX	0.650	0.648	0.079	8.266	0.000	1.533
UX_Explicit Novelty → Explicit hedonic UX	0.468	0.467	0.084	5.559	0.000	1.533
UX_Implicit Perspicuity → Implicit pragmatic UX	0.388	0.386	0.110	3.542	0.000	1.208
UX_Implicit Efficiency → Implicit pragmatic UX	0.770	0.762	0.082	9.399	0.000	1.194
UX_Implicit Dependability → Implicit pragmatic UX	0.059	0.060	0.090	0.653	0.514	1.018
UX_Implicit Stimulation → Implicit hedonic UX	0.701	0.698	0.081	8.666	0.000	1.158
UX_Implicit Novelty → Implicit hedonic UX	0.500	0.497	0.092	5.420	0.000	1.158

Formative indicator → latent variable	Original sample	Sample mean	SD	T-statistics	p-value	VIF
UX_Explicit Perspicuity → Explicit pragmatic UX	0.226	0.225	0.089	2.533	0.011	1.585
UX_Explicit Efficiency → Explicit pragmatic UX	0.850	0.848	0.064	13.274	0.000	1.488
UX_Explicit Dependability → Explicit pragmatic UX	0.019	0.015	0.065	0.289	0.773	1.084
UX_Explicit Stimulation → Explicit hedonic UX	0.650	0.648	0.079	8.266	0.000	1.533
UX_Explicit Novelty → Explicit hedonic UX	0.468	0.467	0.084	5.559	0.000	1.533
UX_Implicit Perspicuity → Implicit pragmatic UX	0.388	0.386	0.110	3.542	0.000	1.208
UX_Implicit Efficiency → Implicit pragmatic UX	0.770	0.762	0.082	9.399	0.000	1.194
UX_Implicit Dependability → Implicit pragmatic UX	0.059	0.060	0.090	0.653	0.514	1.018
UX_Implicit Stimulation → Implicit hedonic UX	0.701	0.698	0.081	8.666	0.000	1.158
UX_Implicit Novelty → Implicit hedonic UX	0.500	0.497	0.092	5.420	0.000	1.158