Summary of the literature on knowledge sharing in smoking cessation OHCs
| Authors | Research focus | Research method | Theory | Research findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ploderer et al. (2013) | Patterns of knowledge sharing | Content analysis | Social support theory | Users' sharing behaviors are distinctive to the stage of quitting. Specifically, most informational comments are made by users later in the process, while supportive responses and leadership are mainly from users who have just started it |
| Myneni et al. (2015) | Shared content | Mixed methods | – | Twelve themes were identified – namely social support, traditions, progress, cravings, motivation, benefits, virtual rewards, relapse, obstacles, nicotine replacement therapy, family and friends and conflict |
| Zhang and Yang (2015) | Patterns of knowledge sharing | Content analysis and social network analysis | Social support theory | Users who share information and knowledge often have been abstinent for a longer time than those who share emotional, esteem and network support |
| Myneni et al. (2016) | Shared content | Qualitative analysis | – | Forty-three concepts were identified. These were further grouped under 12 themes: conflict, virtual rewards, pharmacotherapy, family and friends, obstacles to quitting, benefits of quitting, readiness to quit, cravings, relapse, progress in quitting, social support and traditions |
| Cheung et al. (2017) | Shared content | Content analysis | Social support theory | The themes of sharing in smoking cessation OHCs were classified into three types: views and experience, encouragement and knowledge and information |
| Granado-Font et al. (2018) | Shared content | Content analysis | Social support theory | Most messages shared in smoking cessation OHCs provide informational and emotional support |
| Hefler et al. (2019) | Shared content | Experiment | – | Messages that are child-focused or feature indigenous content are most likely to be shared, and those that include disgusting images, are environment-focused or are ambiguous/sarcastic are less likely to be shared |
| Li et al. (2019) | Motivators for knowledge sharing | Conceptual paper (survey as the proposed method) | Privacy calculus theory | The authors posited that appraisals of threat (i.e. its perceived severity and vulnerability) negatively correlate with knowledge sharing while appraisals of coping (i.e. of response efficacy and self-efficacy) were proposed to have positive influences on knowledge sharing in smoking cessation OHCs |
| Li (2020) | Motivators for knowledge sharing | Questionnaire | Expectation confirmation theory | Knowledge sharing is positively influenced by satisfaction, which is determined by both perceived usefulness and confirmation |
| Li et al. (2021) | Motivators for knowledge sharing | Questionnaire | Post-acceptance model of IS continuance | The perceived usefulness of smoking cessation OHCs in general affects knowledge sharing in specific smoking cessation OHCs |
| Authors | Research focus | Research method | Theory | Research findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patterns of knowledge sharing | Content analysis | Social support theory | Users' sharing behaviors are distinctive to the stage of quitting. Specifically, most informational comments are made by users later in the process, while supportive responses and leadership are mainly from users who have just started it | |
| Shared content | Mixed methods | – | Twelve themes were identified – namely social support, traditions, progress, cravings, motivation, benefits, virtual rewards, relapse, obstacles, nicotine replacement therapy, family and friends and conflict | |
| Patterns of knowledge sharing | Content analysis and social network analysis | Social support theory | Users who share information and knowledge often have been abstinent for a longer time than those who share emotional, esteem and network support | |
| Shared content | Qualitative analysis | – | Forty-three concepts were identified. These were further grouped under 12 themes: conflict, virtual rewards, pharmacotherapy, family and friends, obstacles to quitting, benefits of quitting, readiness to quit, cravings, relapse, progress in quitting, social support and traditions | |
| Shared content | Content analysis | Social support theory | The themes of sharing in smoking cessation OHCs were classified into three types: views and experience, encouragement and knowledge and information | |
| Shared content | Content analysis | Social support theory | Most messages shared in smoking cessation OHCs provide informational and emotional support | |
| Shared content | Experiment | – | Messages that are child-focused or feature indigenous content are most likely to be shared, and those that include disgusting images, are environment-focused or are ambiguous/sarcastic are less likely to be shared | |
| Motivators for knowledge sharing | Conceptual paper (survey as the proposed method) | Privacy calculus theory | The authors posited that appraisals of threat (i.e. its perceived severity and vulnerability) negatively correlate with knowledge sharing while appraisals of coping (i.e. of response efficacy and self-efficacy) were proposed to have positive influences on knowledge sharing in smoking cessation OHCs | |
| Motivators for knowledge sharing | Questionnaire | Expectation confirmation theory | Knowledge sharing is positively influenced by satisfaction, which is determined by both perceived usefulness and confirmation | |
| Motivators for knowledge sharing | Questionnaire | Post-acceptance model of IS continuance | The perceived usefulness of smoking cessation OHCs in general affects knowledge sharing in specific smoking cessation OHCs |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.