Table A4

Full model explaining purchase intention

Coefficient (SE)tp
Outcome variable: Purchase intention
X1: voice vs voice + IH0.00 (0.14)0.010.994
X2: voice vs text−0.25 (0.14)−1.870.062
X3: voice + IH vs text−0.26 (0.13)−1.970.049
Perceived Human-likeness0.51 (0.04)14.080.000
Cognitive Load0.07 (0.04)2.060.040
Persuasion Knowledge−0.22 (0.04)−5.570.000
Indirect effects
Confidence interval
Effect (SE)Lower limitUpper limit
X1 → HL → PI0.10 (0.09)−0.070.29
X2 → HL → PI0.32 (0.09)0.150.50
X3 → HL → PI0.22 (0.09)0.040.41
X1 → CL → PI0.00 (0.02)−0.030.03
X2 → CL → PI−0.03 (0.02)−0.090.00
X3 → CL → PI−0.03 (0.02)−0.070.00
X1 → PK → PI−0.04 (0.04)−0.110.03
X2 → PK → PI−0.03 (0.03)−0.100.03
X3 → PK → PI0.002 (0.04)−0.070.07
X1 → HL → PK → PI0.00 (0.00)−0.010.00
X2 → HL → PK → PI−0.01 (0.01)−0.020.01
X3 → HL → PK → PI−0.004 (0.01)−0.020.01
X1 → CL → PK → PI0.00 (0.01)−0.010.01
X2 → CL → PK → PI0.01 (0.01)0.00030.03
X3 → CL → PK → PI0.01 (0.01)0.00030.03

Note(s):F(8, 441) = 32.89, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.37; controlled for brand familiarity, familiarity with virtual assistants, modality preference; IH = Interaction History; HL = Perceived Human-likeness; CL = Cognitive Load; PK = Persuasion Knowledge; PI = Purchase Intention

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options