Table 3

Trustworthiness criteria of research

Trustworthiness criteriaMethods for meeting trustworthiness criteriaResearch phase
Credibility
  • Selection of leading firms in the field of blockchain technology implementation as a case study and researchers’ experiences in technology adoptions in supply chain assists in providing credibility

Case selection
  • Use of qualitative arguments along with quantitative AHP data collected during interview provides triangulation

Data collection
  • Computed priority weights and verbatim interviews transcripts supporting the priority weights are sent to the participants for feedback

Data analysis
Transferability
  • Detailed description of research setting facilitates in validating the interview protocol

Case selection
  • Hierarchical model developed in this study based on theoretical framework assists in developing semi-structured interview questionnaire

Research design
Dependability
  • Interview protocol developed in this study can be used in future research in similar settings

Data collection
  • Purposive sampling assists in collecting data from participants who are rich in information

Case selection
  • The consistency ratio (CR) of AHP refers to the degree to which decision-makers adhere to the rank order specified and also measures the distortion in data

Data analysis
Confirmability
  • Hierarchical model of first order challenge categories and second order challenges used to collect the data assists in meticulous data management

Research design
  • Findings from AHP are further discussed with participants to make sure the correct interpretations of the quantitative assessments are captured during the interview process

Data analysis

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options