Validity procedures
| Lens | Procedure | Example from this study |
|---|---|---|
| Lens of the researcher | Triangulation |
|
| Disconfirming evidence |
| |
| Lens of study participants | Member checking |
|
| Prolonged engagement in the field |
| |
| Lens of the people external to the study | Chain of Evidence |
|
| Lens | Procedure | Example from this study |
|---|---|---|
| Lens of the researcher | Triangulation | Use of both interviews and activity diaries Use of cross-participant analysis |
| Disconfirming evidence | As this is a prospective longitudinal study, there was room for the analysis to evolve and categories to change through the different waves | |
| Lens of study participants | Member checking | All study participants made themselves available during transcription and coding to allow the researchers to contact them to ask additional questions and confirm interpretations Three participants were asked to review their own single case when the analysis was complete |
| Prolonged engagement in the field | As this is a longitudinal study, significant time was spent with each participant | |
| Lens of the people external to the study | Chain of Evidence | Chains of evidence allow readers to understand how conclusions were derived from the evidence |
Source(s): Adapted from: (Creswell and Miller, 2000)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.