The iterative analytical approach
| First-order concept | Second-order concept | Aggregate dimensions |
|---|---|---|
| The number of projects improved during the time The activities of the living lab have been changed during the time There was a period when the projects stopped | Platform stagnation Platform growth | Platform evolution |
| Each partner developed specific projects and activities The living lab involved different stakeholders Each stakeholder is very important providing specific knowledge The results are not so good as the management decisions are weak Now the project group has the responsibility for the project | Activities Resource contributions | Relational platform |
| The university at the beginning depicted the rules, then the lead role was undertaken by [actor] At the beginning the point of view of the users was not considered This approach reduced the commitment of the partners This orientation generated confusion | Failure of top down perspective Limitations of a bottom up perspective Complexity of business relationships | Drivers of relational governance approach |
| The aim of National HC was to improve the commercial nature of living lab for its purposes The university wanted to develop applied research at the living lab but it had no possibility Students at the beginning considered the living lab for its sustainable nature but then they became interested in comfort dimensions The industry firms focused only on their own goals Nowadays our living lab is a community | Misalignment of goals Generation of a collective goal | Joint goal development |
| First-order concept | Second-order concept | Aggregate dimensions |
|---|---|---|
| Platform stagnation | Platform evolution | |
| Activities | Relational platform | |
| Failure of top down perspective | Drivers of relational governance approach | |
| Misalignment of goals | Joint goal development |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.