Table V. Results of grey relational... | Emerald Publishing

Table V.

Results of grey relational grades obtained from models (11) and (13) and the corresponding compromise grades^a

Site	Γ_k	$Γ_{k}^{'}$	Δ_k(β = 0.5)
Nome	0.7515	1.1554	0.3848 (8)
Newark	1.0000	1.0000	0.5000 (7)
Rock Springs	1.0000	1.3618	0.9480 (2)
Duquesne	0.8770	1.2808	0.6954 (5)
Gary	1.0000	1.1642	0.7033 (3)
Yakima	0.6642	1.068	0.1684 (10)
Turkey	1.0000	1.123	0.6523 (6)
Wells	1.0000	1.4038	1.0000 (1)
Anaheim	0.5962	1.0000	0.0000 (12)
Epcot	1.0000	1.1609	0.6992 (4)
Duckwater	0.6960	1.0999	0.2474 (9)
Santa Cruz	0.6251	1.0289	0.0716 (11)

Site	Γ_k	$Γ_{k}^{'}$	Δ_k(β = 0.5)
Nome	0.7515	1.1554	0.3848 (8)
Newark	1.0000	1.0000	0.5000 (7)
Rock Springs	1.0000	1.3618	0.9480 (2)
Duquesne	0.8770	1.2808	0.6954 (5)
Gary	1.0000	1.1642	0.7033 (3)
Yakima	0.6642	1.068	0.1684 (10)
Turkey	1.0000	1.123	0.6523 (6)
Wells	1.0000	1.4038	1.0000 (1)
Anaheim	0.5962	1.0000	0.0000 (12)
Epcot	1.0000	1.1609	0.6992 (4)
Duckwater	0.6960	1.0999	0.2474 (9)
Santa Cruz	0.6251	1.0289	0.0716 (11)

Note:

^a

The site ranks are given in parentheses