Table 2

Performance evaluation-static approach

Optimization 120 daysOptimization 150 daysOptimization 180 days
MVPERCMDPMVPERCMDPMVPERCMDP
Panel A
ES (%)−1.276−2.846−0.792−1.284−2.840−1.847−1.302−2.832−1.849
VaR (%)−1.015−2.263−0.628−1.021−2.258−1.468−1.036−2.252−1.469
Drawdown (%)12.70082.4007.97014.40080.68046.83015.50080.38047.630
Omega1.0771.0771.2581.0791.0771.0911.0751.0791.085
Sortino (%)2.7613.1247.4872.8893.2123.9792.7763.3313.758
Sharpe (%)1.8872.2194.4301.9702.2832.6901.8852.3602.531
Panel B
ES (%)−2.466−3.293−2.118−2.478−3.279−2.777−2.441−3.241−2.742
VaR (%)−1.990−2.646−1.708−1.999−2.635−2.235−1.971−2.605−2.207
Drawdown (%)88.81586.58138.76788.96186.90886.11888.76686.24185.675
Omega0.5830.7800.6840.5850.7820.7040.5590.7720.686
Sortino (%)−13.087−8.639−12.701−12.930−8.610−10.311−13.657−9.025−10.867
Sharpe (%)−10.040−6.355−9.179−9.915−6.363−7.622−10.679−6.734−8.158

Note(s): This table exhibits performance measurement of MVP, ERC and MDP portfolio with different estimation windows (120, 150 and 180 days). Panel A shows the performance without transaction cost, while Panel B indicates the performance with transaction cost (50 basis points). The risk-free rate was assumed to be zero for the calculation of Sharpe and minimum acceptance return (MAR) of Sortino. A target threshold of zero was also used in omega ratio

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options