Classification table of officer misidentification in the current performance appraisal system
| MQ/ACOM evaluations received | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MQ/ACOM evaluations deserved | 0 (%) | 1 (%) | 2 (%) | 3 (%) | 4 (%) | 5 (%) |
| 0 | 8.98 | 3.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1 | 2.97 | 7.35 | 3.37 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 0.21 | 3.26 | 10.80 | 3.88 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 3.71 | 11.75 | 4.92 | 0.40 |
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 4.69 | 11.04 | 5.24 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.43 | 5.18 | 8.06 |
| MQ/ACOM evaluations received | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MQ/ACOM evaluations deserved | 0 (%) | 1 (%) | 2 (%) | 3 (%) | 4 (%) | 5 (%) |
| 0 | 8.98 | 3.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1 | 2.97 | 7.35 | 3.37 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 0.21 | 3.26 | 10.80 | 3.88 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 3.71 | 11.75 | 4.92 | 0.40 |
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 4.69 | 11.04 | 5.24 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.43 | 5.18 | 8.06 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.