Relation between reputation, stock returns and dividend yields
| Panel A. Reputation dummy: RPT5 | Panel B. Reputation dummy: RPT3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
| RPT | −0.610* (−1.65) | 0.441 (1.24) | 0.329 (0.88) | −0.801*** (−2.35) | 0.057 (0.20) | 0.001 (0.01) |
| RPT × Log(DY) | 0.070* (1.80) | 0.033* (1.90) | 0.036** (2.03) | 0.033* (1.67) | 0.025 (1.32) | 0.027 (1.45) |
| RPT × ΔDY | −0.134*** (−2.80) | −0.113*** (−2.67) | −0.112*** (−2.63) | −0.093** (−2.08) | −0.074* (−1.88) | −0.073* (−1.84) |
| RPT × Log(MV) | 0.024* (1.73) | −0.011 (−0.90) | −0.006 (−0.47) | 0.033*** (2.46) | 0.006 (0.60) | 0.009 (0.77) |
| RPT × MB | −0.448*** (−2.56) | −0.430*** (−2.44) | −0.435*** (−3.13) | −0.419*** (−3.00) | ||
| RPT × Log(MV) × MB | 0.015*** (2.53) | 0.015*** (2.41) | 0.014*** (2.89) | 0.014*** (2.76) | ||
| RPT × LargeSh | −0.153 (−1.46) | −0.168 (−1.61) | −0.183** (−2.25) | −0.189** (−2.31) | ||
| RPT × FMsh | −0.023 (−0.72) | −0.005 (−0.20) | ||||
| Log(DY) | 0.009 (0.23) | 0.041 (1.22) | 0.042 (1.26) | 0.0001 (0.01) | 0.001 (1.02) | 0.0001 (1.01) |
| ΔDY | 0.053** (2.29) | 0.033* (1.72) | 0.032 (1.63) | 0.059*** (2.31) | 0.037* (1.77) | 0.035* (1.67) |
| Log(MV) | −0.278*** (−8.46) | −0.225*** (−17.36) | −0.220*** (−17.50) | −0.285*** (−8.10) | −0.226*** (−16.47) | −0.222*** (−16.58) |
| ROA | 0.402*** (4.13) | 0.318*** (3.77) | 0.323*** (3.83) | 0.383*** (3.95) | 0.321*** (3.80) | 0.326*** (3.85) |
| MB | −0.001 (−1.14) | −0.001 (−1.17) | −0.001 (−1.17) | −0.001 (−1.16) | −0.001 (−1.14) | −0.001 (−1.14) |
| LargeSh | 0.632*** (6.96) | 0.624*** (6.93) | 0.647*** (6.87) | 0.639*** (6.84) | ||
| FMsh | −0.048** (−2.07) | −0.049** (−1.96) | ||||
| rmt | 0.743*** (12.36) | 0.643*** (27.09) | 0.644*** (27.06) | 0.744*** (12.34) | 0.644*** (27.23) | 0.645*** (27.20) |
| Constant | 7.100*** (8.40) | 5.476*** (17.43) | 5.378*** (17.54) | 7.272*** (8.06) | 5.511*** (16.59) | 5.414*** (16.67) |
| Observations | 21,326 | 21,207 | 21,207 | 21,326 | 21,207 | 21,207 |
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Clusters(firms) | 1,993 | 1,991 | 1,991 | 1,993 | 1,991 | 1,991 |
| Within R2 | 0.101 | 0.163 | 0.164 | 0.101 | 0.164 | 0.164 |
| Panel A. Reputation dummy: | Panel B. Reputation dummy: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
| −0.610 | 0.441 (1.24) | 0.329 (0.88) | −0.801 | 0.057 (0.20) | 0.001 (0.01) | |
| 0.070 | 0.033 | 0.036 | 0.033 | 0.025 (1.32) | 0.027 (1.45) | |
| −0.134 | −0.113 | −0.112 | −0.093 | −0.074 | −0.073 | |
| 0.024 | −0.011 (−0.90) | −0.006 (−0.47) | 0.033 | 0.006 (0.60) | 0.009 (0.77) | |
| −0.448 | −0.430 | −0.435 | −0.419 | |||
| 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.014 | |||
| −0.153 (−1.46) | −0.168 (−1.61) | −0.183 | −0.189 | |||
| −0.023 (−0.72) | −0.005 (−0.20) | |||||
| 0.009 (0.23) | 0.041 (1.22) | 0.042 (1.26) | 0.0001 (0.01) | 0.001 (1.02) | 0.0001 (1.01) | |
| Δ | 0.053 | 0.033 | 0.032 (1.63) | 0.059 | 0.037 | 0.035 |
| −0.278 | −0.225 | −0.220 | −0.285 | −0.226 | −0.222 | |
| 0.402 | 0.318 | 0.323 | 0.383 | 0.321 | 0.326 | |
| −0.001 (−1.14) | −0.001 (−1.17) | −0.001 (−1.17) | −0.001 (−1.16) | −0.001 (−1.14) | −0.001 (−1.14) | |
| 0.632 | 0.624 | 0.647 | 0.639 | |||
| −0.048 | −0.049 | |||||
| 0.743 | 0.643 | 0.644 | 0.744 | 0.644 | 0.645 | |
| Constant | 7.100 | 5.476 | 5.378 | 7.272 | 5.511 | 5.414 |
| Observations | 21,326 | 21,207 | 21,207 | 21,326 | 21,207 | 21,207 |
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Clusters(firms) | 1,993 | 1,991 | 1,991 | 1,993 | 1,991 | 1,991 |
| Within | 0.101 | 0.163 | 0.164 | 0.101 | 0.164 | 0.164 |
Notes:
This table reports the results from panel regressions of one-year future excess returns on the reputation dummies, RPT5 or RPT3; dividend yields; their interaction terms; and other control variables. The reputation dummy is RPT5 in Panel A and RPT3 in Panel B. The variables are defined in Table 1. t-statistics are based on standard errors adjusted for the firm-clustering effect and are in parentheses.
,
and
denote statistical significance at the 1, 5 and 10% levels, respectively. The sample period is from 1998 to 2019
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.