Comparison of transaction structures and fees in domestic and overseas credit card markets
| Payer | Four-party scheme (USA, Europe, etc.) | Three-party scheme (Korea) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Payee | Name | Payee | ||
| Merchant | Merchant discount rate | Interchange fee | Issuer | Merchant discount | Credit card company |
| |||||
| Network assessment fee | Card network company | ||||
| |||||
| Acquisition fee | Acquirer | ||||
| |||||
| Cardholder | Annual membership fee | Issuer | Annual membership fee | Credit card company | |
| Account maintenance fee and other fees | Issuer | None | None | ||
| Payer | Four-party scheme (USA, Europe, etc.) | Three-party scheme (Korea) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Payee | Name | Payee | ||
| Merchant | Merchant | Interchange fee | Issuer | Merchant | Credit card company |
- Card issuance, cardholder management, authorization of transactions, etc. | |||||
| Network assessment fee | Card network company | ||||
- building and management of a network | |||||
| Acquisition fee | Acquirer | ||||
- recruitment and acquisition of merchants | |||||
| Cardholder | Annual membership fee | Issuer | Annual membership fee | Credit card company | |
| Account maintenance fee and other fees | Issuer | None | None | ||
Note(s): This table compares the fee structure, payers and payees of two different transaction systems. The four-party scheme is more common in the U.S. and Europe, while the Korean credit card market is based on the three-party scheme
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.