Table 3

Average monthly Long–short (H-L) alphas in good and bad times

Long–short (HL) portfolio
AlphaHAlphaLAlphaHLβMKTRFβSMBβHML
Panel A. Badtimes: Shiller's CAPE
CAPM0.140**0.976***−0.836***0.128***  
 (2.30)(8.56)(−9.28)(3.53)  
Fama-French−0.281***0.024−0.305***0.025−0.528***0.339***
 (−4.42)(0.32)(−5.88)(0.91)(−15.55)(21.48)
Panel B. Good Times: Shiller's CAPE
CAPM0.477**0.529***−0.0520.118***  
 (2.57)(2.74)(−0.50)(3.62)  
Fama-French0.232**0.300***−0.0680.102**−0.427***0.379***
 (2.32)(3.52)(−0.50)(2.10)(−16.53)(15.22)
Panel C. Bad Times: GDP Forecasting
CAPM0.177**0.807***−0.630***0.175***  
 (2.25)(7.07)(−6.96)(5.21)  
Fama-French−0.269***0.014−0.283***0.042−0.555***0.367***
 (−3.98)(0.19)(−4.26)(1.28)(−17.42)(21.00)
Panel D. Good Times: GDP Forecasting
CAPM0.360**0.872***−0.512***0.045  
 (2.52)(4.61)(−3.59)(1.08)  
Fama-French0.1270.270***−0.1430.062*−0.401***0.327***
 (1.32)(2.84)(−1.38)(1.71)(−11.31)(15.94)

Note(s): This table shows the CAPM alphas and three-factor alphas for the high–low quintile portfolio. HL refers to the long position in the firms with the highest ESG score and the short position in the firms with the lowest ESG score. For each month, stocks are sorted into quintile portfolios according to the ESG score. We then construct a long–short portfolio (HL). The sample period is from January 2012 to December 2020. The t-statistics are in parentheses and statistical significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels is given by *, ** and ***, respectively

Source(s): Author's work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal