Comparison of path coefficient between male and female groups
| Hypotheses | Paths | Males | Females | Path differences | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | p-value | Coefficients | p-value | tspooled | Hypotheses | ||
| H4a | Response efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.369 | 0.000 | 0.075 | 0.413 | 30.795*** | Supported |
| H4b | Self-efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.145 | 0.160 | 0.296 | 0.001 | 14.355*** | Supported |
| H4c | Response cost → Continuance intention | −0.255 | 0.013 | −0.324 | 0.000 | 6.638*** | Supported |
| Hypotheses | Paths | Males | Females | Path differences | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | Coefficients | Hypotheses | |||||
| Response efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.369 | 0.000 | 0.075 | 0.413 | 30.795*** | Supported | |
| Self-efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.145 | 0.160 | 0.296 | 0.001 | 14.355*** | Supported | |
| Response cost → Continuance intention | −0.255 | 0.013 | −0.324 | 0.000 | 6.638*** | Supported | |
Note(s): ***p < 0.001. The formula for computing the tspooled significance of the differences in the path coefficients for the various subgroup samples is derived from Keil et al. (2000) (see Appendix for details)