Comparison of path coefficient between male and female groups
| Hypotheses | Paths | Males | Females | Path differences | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | p-value | Coefficients | p-value | tspooled | Hypotheses | ||
| H4a | Response efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.369 | 0.000 | 0.075 | 0.413 | 30.795*** | Supported |
| H4b | Self-efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.145 | 0.160 | 0.296 | 0.001 | 14.355*** | Supported |
| H4c | Response cost → Continuance intention | −0.255 | 0.013 | −0.324 | 0.000 | 6.638*** | Supported |
| Hypotheses | Paths | Males | Females | Path differences | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | Coefficients | Hypotheses | |||||
| Response efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.369 | 0.000 | 0.075 | 0.413 | 30.795*** | Supported | |
| Self-efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.145 | 0.160 | 0.296 | 0.001 | 14.355*** | Supported | |
| Response cost → Continuance intention | −0.255 | 0.013 | −0.324 | 0.000 | 6.638*** | Supported | |
Note(s): ***p < 0.001. The formula for computing the tspooled significance of the differences in the path coefficients for the various subgroup samples is derived from Keil et al. (2000) (see Appendix for details)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.