Comparative results of mediating effects of male and female groups
| Pathway | Male | Female | Path differences | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | p-value | Coefficients | p-value | tspooled | |
| Perceived disease threats → Response efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.156 | 0.001 | 0.022 | 0.427 | 31.987*** |
| Perceived disease threats → Self-efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.052 | 0.270 | 0.132 | 0.003 | 16.328*** |
| Perceived disease threats → Response cost → Continuance intention | 0.057 | 0.046 | 0.070 | 0.013 | 4.234*** |
| Pathway | Male | Female | Path differences | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | Coefficients | ||||
| Perceived disease threats → Response efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.156 | 0.001 | 0.022 | 0.427 | 31.987*** |
| Perceived disease threats → Self-efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.052 | 0.270 | 0.132 | 0.003 | 16.328*** |
| Perceived disease threats → Response cost → Continuance intention | 0.057 | 0.046 | 0.070 | 0.013 | 4.234*** |
Note(s): ***p < 0.001. The formula for computing the tspooled significance of the differences in the path coefficients for the various subgroup samples is derived from Keil et al. (2000) (see Appendix for details)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.