Comparative results of mediating effects of male and female groups
| Pathway | Male | Female | Path differences | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | p-value | Coefficients | p-value | tspooled | |
| Perceived disease threats → Response efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.156 | 0.001 | 0.022 | 0.427 | 31.987*** |
| Perceived disease threats → Self-efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.052 | 0.270 | 0.132 | 0.003 | 16.328*** |
| Perceived disease threats → Response cost → Continuance intention | 0.057 | 0.046 | 0.070 | 0.013 | 4.234*** |
| Pathway | Male | Female | Path differences | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | Coefficients | ||||
| Perceived disease threats → Response efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.156 | 0.001 | 0.022 | 0.427 | 31.987*** |
| Perceived disease threats → Self-efficacy → Continuance intention | 0.052 | 0.270 | 0.132 | 0.003 | 16.328*** |
| Perceived disease threats → Response cost → Continuance intention | 0.057 | 0.046 | 0.070 | 0.013 | 4.234*** |
Note(s): ***p < 0.001. The formula for computing the tspooled significance of the differences in the path coefficients for the various subgroup samples is derived from Keil et al. (2000) (see Appendix for details)