Panel logistic regression results (risk model)
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| diq_site | 1.76E−02 (1.32) | 1.55E−02 (1.17) | 1.46E−02 (1.1) | 1.51E−02 (1.15) | 2.75E−03 (1.30) |
| diq_mobile | 7.91E−02**** (5.6) | 8.25E−02**** (5.8) | 7.87E−02**** (5.59) | 7.91E−02**** (5.63) | 8.18E−02**** (5.71) |
| diq_marketing | 3.90E−02*** (2.52) | 3.93E−02** (2.54) | 4.08E−02*** (2.63) | 3.96E−02** (2.57) | 3.71E−02** (2.38) |
| diq_social | −1.57E−02 (−0.85) | −1.49E−02 (−0.82) | −1.68E−02 (−0.92) | −1.39E−02 (−0.77) | −1.33E−02 (−0.73) |
| PatCite | 2.74E−03*** (3.2) | 2.39E−03 (2.68) | 1.25E−03 (0.99) | 1.49E−03 (1.33) | 2.75E−03 (1.46) |
| PatCite*diq_site | −8.79E−05*** (−2.89) | −7.76E−05** (−2.00) | |||
| PatCite*diq_mobile | −1.37E−04* (−1.87) | −9.32E−05 (−0.98) | |||
| PatCite*diq_marketing | −2.83E−05 (−0.59) | 6.20E−05 (0.95) | |||
| PatCite*social | −1.21E−04 (−1.01) | −5.35E−05 (−0.65) | |||
| log_rev | 2.46E−01**** (7.1) | 2.52E−01**** (7.43) | 2.54E−01**** (7.53) | 2.56E−01**** (7.67) | 2.49E−01**** (7.2) |
| lggw | −8.33E−02* (−1.74) | −8.76E−02* (−1.87) | −9.69E−02* (−2.09) | −9.92E−02* (−2.15) | −8.35E−02* (−1.74) |
| lgacq | 6.58E−02 (1.02) | 6.54E−02 (1.02) | 7.49E−02 (1.17) | 7.13E−02 (1.12) | 6.08E−02 (0.94) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| diq_site | 1.76E−02 (1.32) | 1.55E−02 (1.17) | 1.46E−02 (1.1) | 1.51E−02 (1.15) | 2.75E−03 (1.30) |
| diq_mobile | 7.91E−02**** (5.6) | 8.25E−02**** (5.8) | 7.87E−02**** (5.59) | 7.91E−02**** (5.63) | 8.18E−02**** (5.71) |
| diq_marketing | 3.90E−02*** (2.52) | 3.93E−02** (2.54) | 4.08E−02*** (2.63) | 3.96E−02** (2.57) | 3.71E−02** (2.38) |
| diq_social | −1.57E−02 (−0.85) | −1.49E−02 (−0.82) | −1.68E−02 (−0.92) | −1.39E−02 (−0.77) | −1.33E−02 (−0.73) |
| PatCite | 2.74E−03*** (3.2) | 2.39E−03 (2.68) | 1.25E−03 (0.99) | 1.49E−03 (1.33) | 2.75E−03 (1.46) |
| PatCite*diq_site | −8.79E−05*** (−2.89) | −7.76E−05** (−2.00) | |||
| PatCite*diq_mobile | −1.37E−04* (−1.87) | −9.32E−05 (−0.98) | |||
| PatCite*diq_marketing | −2.83E−05 (−0.59) | 6.20E−05 (0.95) | |||
| PatCite*social | −1.21E−04 (−1.01) | −5.35E−05 (−0.65) | |||
| log_rev | 2.46E−01**** (7.1) | 2.52E−01**** (7.43) | 2.54E−01**** (7.53) | 2.56E−01**** (7.67) | 2.49E−01**** (7.2) |
| lggw | −8.33E−02* (−1.74) | −8.76E−02* (−1.87) | −9.69E−02* (−2.09) | −9.92E−02* (−2.15) | −8.35E−02* (−1.74) |
| lgacq | 6.58E−02 (1.02) | 6.54E−02 (1.02) | 7.49E−02 (1.17) | 7.13E−02 (1.12) | 6.08E−02 (0.94) |
Note(s): ****, ***, ** and * Indicate significance at the 0.001, 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10 levels (two−tailed), respectively
Controlled for revenue, goodwill and acquisitions
Table 4 presents the results of panel logit regressions that examine the relation between DT and breach likelihood
Z values (in parentheses) are reported below the coefficient estimates and are based on robust standard error
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.