The PSM results for full sample in 2010 (outcome variable = log of hourly earnings, treatment = female, bootstrapped standard errors)
| Sample | Treated | Controls | Difference | S.E. | T-stat | Observations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated (male) | Treated (female) | ||||||
| Full sample | |||||||
| Unmatched | 9.2628 | 9.4316 | −0.1688 | 0.0156 | −10.84 | 4,543 | 3,018 |
| ATET | 9.2628 | 9.5448 | −0.2820*** | 0.0289 | −9.77 | ||
| Sample | Treated | Controls | Difference | S.E. | Observations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated (male) | Treated (female) | ||||||
| Unmatched | 9.2628 | 9.4316 | −0.1688 | 0.0156 | −10.84 | 4,543 | 3,018 |
| ATET | 9.2628 | 9.5448 | −0.2820*** | 0.0289 | −9.77 | ||
Note(s): ***indicates statistical significance at 0.01 level
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.