Results of ordinal regression for gambler’s fallacy bias
| χ2 9.352 P = 0.405 | Estimate | Std. error | Wald | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explained variable | ||||
| Gambler’s Fallacy = 1 | −1.524 | 1.233 | 1.528 | 0.216 |
| Gambler’s Fallacy = 2 | −0.138 | 1.230 | 0.013 | 0.911 |
| Explanatory variable | ||||
| Financial literacy score | −0.069 | 0.029 | 5.449 | 0.020** |
| Gender | −0.154 | 0.220 | 0.491 | 0.484 |
| Age group | −0.243 | 0.233 | 1.088 | 0.297 |
| Education | −0.109 | 0.239 | 0.208 | 0.648 |
| Area of specialization | 0.291 | 0.382 | 0.580 | 0.446 |
| Average income | −0.186 | 0.244 | 0.580 | 0.446 |
| Main source of information | 0.227 | 0.213 | 1.133 | 0.287 |
| Preferred investment | 0.044 | 0.229 | 0.037 | 0.847 |
| Frequency of information | 0.094 | 0.703 | 0.018 | 0.894 |
| χ2 9.352 | Estimate | Std. error | Wald | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gambler’s Fallacy = 1 | −1.524 | 1.233 | 1.528 | 0.216 |
| Gambler’s Fallacy = 2 | −0.138 | 1.230 | 0.013 | 0.911 |
| Financial literacy score | −0.069 | 0.029 | 5.449 | 0.020 |
| Gender | −0.154 | 0.220 | 0.491 | 0.484 |
| Age group | −0.243 | 0.233 | 1.088 | 0.297 |
| Education | −0.109 | 0.239 | 0.208 | 0.648 |
| Area of specialization | 0.291 | 0.382 | 0.580 | 0.446 |
| Average income | −0.186 | 0.244 | 0.580 | 0.446 |
| Main source of information | 0.227 | 0.213 | 1.133 | 0.287 |
| Preferred investment | 0.044 | 0.229 | 0.037 | 0.847 |
| Frequency of information | 0.094 | 0.703 | 0.018 | 0.894 |
Notes:
**p ≤ 0.05
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.