Table 1 Structural model results and... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1

Structural model results and effect sizes

Criterion	Predictors	R²	R² adjusted	Q²	β (path coefficient)	Bootstrap t-test	p-value	f²
Job	SER.S	0.778	0.777	0.366	0.015	0.180	0.857	0.000
satisfaction	SER.P	0.628	0.625	0.322	0.526	8.094	0.000	0.371
	SIR.S	0.778	0.777		0.869	11.318	0.000	0.012
	SIR.P				0.328	4.326	0.000	0.144
Turnover	SER.S	0.475	0.473	0.276	−0.227	2.084	0.037	0.023
intention	SER.P	0.549	0.543	0.475	−0.258	3.138	0.002	0.054
	SIR.S	0.475	0.475		−0.218	1.371	0.171	0.023
	SIR.P		0.473		−0.235	3.122	0.002	0.054
	Job satisfaction.S		0.473		−0.696	5.952	0.000	0.205
	Job satisfaction.P		0.473		−0.326	3.626	0.000	0.087

Criterion	Predictors	R²	R² adjusted	Q²	β (path coefficient)	Bootstrap t-test	p-value	f²
Job	SER.S	0.778	0.777	0.366	0.015	0.180	0.857	0.000
satisfaction	SER.P	0.628	0.625	0.322	0.526	8.094	0.000	0.371
	SIR.S	0.778	0.777		0.869	11.318	0.000	0.012
	SIR.P				0.328	4.326	0.000	0.144
Turnover	SER.S	0.475	0.473	0.276	−0.227	2.084	0.037	0.023
intention	SER.P	0.549	0.543	0.475	−0.258	3.138	0.002	0.054
	SIR.S	0.475	0.475		−0.218	1.371	0.171	0.023
	SIR.P		0.473		−0.235	3.122	0.002	0.054
	Job satisfaction.S		0.473		−0.696	5.952	0.000	0.205
	Job satisfaction.P		0.473		−0.326	3.626	0.000	0.087

Note(s): f² = .S, whereas Mosquera et al.’s (2020) result = .P, for example SER:S stands for satisfaction with extrinsic rewards among Swedish brokers

Source(s): Own