Questions used in the survey and summary statistics for 106 respondents
| Mean | Std. Deviation | Minimum | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. The negotiated rent is affected by how GDP has developed during the past year | 3.44 | 1.52 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 2. The negotiated rent is affected by how GDP is expected to develop during the current and next year | 3.51 | 1.44 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 3. The negotiated rent is affected by how the regional economy has developed during the past year | 4.06 | 1.36 | 1.00 | 6.00 |
| 4. The negotiated rent is affected by expectations of how the regional economy will develop in the current and next years | 4.20 | 1.36 | 1.00 | 6.00 |
| 5. The negotiated rent is affected by how the industry in which the store is located has developed during the past year | 4.70 | 1.39 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 6. The negotiated rent is affected by how the industry in which the store is located is expected to develop during the current and next year | 4.59 | 1.33 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 7. The negotiated rent is affected by how e-commerce has developed in the industry you have negotiated rent for during the past year | 3.68 | 1.48 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 8. The negotiated rent is affected by how e-commerce in the industry you have negotiated rent for is expected to develop during the current and next year | 3.70 | 1.51 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 9. The negotiated rent is affected by the location of the premises | 5.65 | 1.12 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 10. The negotiated rent is affected by expectations of consumers’ buying behavior | 4.57 | 1.33 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 11. The negotiated rent is affected by the OCR for the premises | 4.39 | 1.45 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 12. The negotiated rent is affected by the current rent level in the premises | 5.11 | 1.17 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 13. The negotiated rent is affected by expectations of the property's future market value | 4.38 | 1.34 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 14. The negotiated rent is affected by previous vacancies on the premises | 4.31 | 1.42 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 15. The negotiated rent is affected by expectations of future lower/higher vacancies | 4.33 | 1.44 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 16. The negotiated rent is affected by information and statistics from, for example, Swedish Trade Institute, HUI and the Property Owners | 3.67 | 1.39 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 17. The negotiated rent is affected by information about rents via colleagues in the industry | 4.20 | 1.39 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 18.The negotiated rent is affected by the proximity to anchor tenants | 4.72 | 1.22 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 19. The negotiated rent is affected by the tenant mix | 4.66 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 20. I have confidence in the lease negotiation process based on laws and regulations | 4.94 | 1.22 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 21. I have confidence in how my counterpart as an organization negotiates rents for our common good | 3.98 | 1.30 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 22. I have confidence in how my counterpart as an individual negotiates rents for our common good | 4.01 | 1.27 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 23. Gender (1 = female, 2 = male) | 1.62 | 0.49 | 1 | 2 |
| 24. Year of experience | 3.96 | 1.33 | 1 | 6 |
| 25. Town size (1 = large, 2 = medium, 3 = smal) | 1.50 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| 26. Type of location (1 = street, 2 = retail center, 3 = external) | 1.75 | 0.70 | 1 | 3 |
| 27. Current OCR 1=< 2%, 13 = don’t know) | 5.20 | 3.75 | 1.00 | 13.00 |
| 28. Corona efffect on rent (1 = no effect, 8 = high effect) | 2.36 | 1.24 | 1.00 | 8.00 |
| Mean | Std. Deviation | Minimum | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. The negotiated rent is affected by how GDP has developed during the past year | 3.44 | 1.52 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 2. The negotiated rent is affected by how GDP is expected to develop during the current and next year | 3.51 | 1.44 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 3. The negotiated rent is affected by how the regional economy has developed during the past year | 4.06 | 1.36 | 1.00 | 6.00 |
| 4. The negotiated rent is affected by expectations of how the regional economy will develop in the current and next years | 4.20 | 1.36 | 1.00 | 6.00 |
| 5. The negotiated rent is affected by how the industry in which the store is located has developed during the past year | 4.70 | 1.39 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 6. The negotiated rent is affected by how the industry in which the store is located is expected to develop during the current and next year | 4.59 | 1.33 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 7. The negotiated rent is affected by how e-commerce has developed in the industry you have negotiated rent for during the past year | 3.68 | 1.48 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 8. The negotiated rent is affected by how e-commerce in the industry you have negotiated rent for is expected to develop during the current and next year | 3.70 | 1.51 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 9. The negotiated rent is affected by the location of the premises | 5.65 | 1.12 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 10. The negotiated rent is affected by expectations of consumers’ buying behavior | 4.57 | 1.33 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 11. The negotiated rent is affected by the OCR for the premises | 4.39 | 1.45 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 12. The negotiated rent is affected by the current rent level in the premises | 5.11 | 1.17 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 13. The negotiated rent is affected by expectations of the property's future market value | 4.38 | 1.34 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 14. The negotiated rent is affected by previous vacancies on the premises | 4.31 | 1.42 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 15. The negotiated rent is affected by expectations of future lower/higher vacancies | 4.33 | 1.44 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 16. The negotiated rent is affected by information and statistics from, for example, Swedish Trade Institute, HUI and the Property Owners | 3.67 | 1.39 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 17. The negotiated rent is affected by information about rents via colleagues in the industry | 4.20 | 1.39 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 18.The negotiated rent is affected by the proximity to anchor tenants | 4.72 | 1.22 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 19. The negotiated rent is affected by the tenant mix | 4.66 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 20. I have confidence in the lease negotiation process based on laws and regulations | 4.94 | 1.22 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 21. I have confidence in how my counterpart as an organization negotiates rents for our common good | 3.98 | 1.30 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 22. I have confidence in how my counterpart as an individual negotiates rents for our common good | 4.01 | 1.27 | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 23. Gender (1 = female, 2 = male) | 1.62 | 0.49 | 1 | 2 |
| 24. Year of experience | 3.96 | 1.33 | 1 | 6 |
| 25. Town size (1 = large, 2 = medium, 3 = smal) | 1.50 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| 26. Type of location (1 = street, 2 = retail center, 3 = external) | 1.75 | 0.70 | 1 | 3 |
| 27. Current OCR 1=< 2%, 13 = don’t know) | 5.20 | 3.75 | 1.00 | 13.00 |
| 28. Corona efffect on rent (1 = no effect, 8 = high effect) | 2.36 | 1.24 | 1.00 | 8.00 |
Note(s):.Variables 1–22 are measured on a seven-point Likert scale, where 1 = not agree at all and 7 = totally agree
Source(s): Author’s own creation
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.