| G | Organisation’s finance department |
| F | Internal audit committee |
| R | External risk manager |
| A | Accountant |
| Fa | Forensic accountant |
| Z | Nature of human resources for the investigation of cyberfraud (Index z): g, f, r, a and fa, where g, f, a and fa are internal anti-fraud personnels while r is external |
| Nc | Number of available human resources of types c, ∀c |
| I | Number of bank’s branches, i = 1, 2… . I |
| J | Number of shift of anti-fraud personnel, j = 1, 2, 3, i.e. J = 3 |
| S | Types of cyberfraud occurrences, s = 1, 2,……p |
| Aijz | Minimum number of total human resources of type z to be allocated to i-th bank’s branches and j-th shift |
| Cz | The cost of the employed capacities (both the hiring and operational cost of the anti-fraud personnel of type z). In this case, Cg, Cf, Cr, Ca and Cfa for the cost for the organisation’s finance department, internal audit committee, risk manager, accountant and forensic accountant |
| Average number of reported or suspected cyberfraud cases of type s by the anti-fraud personnel of type z |
| Pij | Pij is considered to be 1 if there is a possibility of a cyberfraud occurrence in i-th bank’s branches and j-th shift, otherwise Pij is taken as zero |
| dij | Minimum number of external risk managers and forensic accountants for cyberfraud investigation in i-th bank’s branches and j-th shift |
| eij | Minimum number of forensic accountants for cyberfraud control in i-th bank’s branches and j-th shift |
| SOijs | Cyberfraud occurrence of type s at in i-th bank’s branches j-th shift SOijs ϵ {0, 1}. If cyberfraud occurs it takes the value of 1 otherwise 0 |
| Ms | Minimum number of anti-fraud personnel to be deployed for cyberfraud incidences of type s |
| hij | Duration of cyberfraud investigation in i-th bank’s branches and j-th shift |