Table 3 Thecommon method bias analysis...

Table 3

Thecommon method bias analysis using the common method factor model

Lower-order construct	Indicator	Substantive factor			Common method factor
Lower-order construct	Indicator	Loading R1	Significance	R1²	Loading R²	Significance	R22
Inter-organisational coordination	CT2	0.776	*	0.602	−0.066	NS	0.004
	CT4	0.582	*	0.339	0.156	NS	0.024
	FX3	0.932	*	0.869	−0.164	NS	0.027
	FX4	0.81	*	0.656	−0.092	NS	0.008
	RI1	0.746	*	0.557	0.056	NS	0.003
	R16	0.549	*	0.301	0.125	NS	0.016
Adaptability	ADT4	1.02	*	1.040	−0.288	NS	0.083
	ADT5	0.591	*	0.349	0.315	NS	0.099
	ADT2	0.826	*	0.682	−0.068	NS	0.005
Self-organisation	SORG1	0.855	*	0.731	−0.071	NS	0.005
	SORG4	0.759	*	0.576	0.026	NS	0.001
	SORG5	0.766	*	0.587	−0.026	NS	0.001
Networks	NTWK1	0.711	*	0.506	0.184	NS	0.034
	NTWK7	0.706	*	0.498	−0.019	NS	0.000
	NTWK9	0.76	*	0.578	−0.053	NS	0.003
	NTWK5	0.779	*	0.607	0.024	NS	0.001
	NTWK6	0.622	*	0.387	0.132	NS	0.017
	NTWK8	0.738	*	0.545	−0.026	NS	0.001
Sum		14.949		12.6202	−0.001		0.2855
Average		0.8305		0.701	0.000		0.016
Ratio			44.204			1

Lower-order construct	Indicator	Substantive factor			Common method factor
Lower-order construct	Indicator	Loading R1	Significance	R1²	Loading R²	Significance	R22
Inter-organisational coordination	CT2	0.776	*	0.602	−0.066	NS	0.004
	CT4	0.582	*	0.339	0.156	NS	0.024
	FX3	0.932	*	0.869	−0.164	NS	0.027
	FX4	0.81	*	0.656	−0.092	NS	0.008
	RI1	0.746	*	0.557	0.056	NS	0.003
	R16	0.549	*	0.301	0.125	NS	0.016
Adaptability	ADT4	1.02	*	1.040	−0.288	NS	0.083
	ADT5	0.591	*	0.349	0.315	NS	0.099
	ADT2	0.826	*	0.682	−0.068	NS	0.005
Self-organisation	SORG1	0.855	*	0.731	−0.071	NS	0.005
	SORG4	0.759	*	0.576	0.026	NS	0.001
	SORG5	0.766	*	0.587	−0.026	NS	0.001
Networks	NTWK1	0.711	*	0.506	0.184	NS	0.034
	NTWK7	0.706	*	0.498	−0.019	NS	0.000
	NTWK9	0.76	*	0.578	−0.053	NS	0.003
	NTWK5	0.779	*	0.607	0.024	NS	0.001
	NTWK6	0.622	*	0.387	0.132	NS	0.017
	NTWK8	0.738	*	0.545	−0.026	NS	0.001
Sum		14.949		12.6202	−0.001		0.2855
Average		0.8305		0.701	0.000		0.016
Ratio			44.204			1

Note(s): * significance (p < 0.05). NS is for not significant. Figure 3 on page is the diagrammatical presentation of the SmartPLS-SEM CMF model from which these results are derived

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable