DEA methods with strength and weakness
| DEA method | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional DEA | Cross efficiency DEA | Super efficiency DEA | |
| Strength | (1)Can separate efficient DMUs from DMUs to be evaluated | (1)Can use cross efficiency score (CES) as a relative evaluation between any pair of DMUs (2)Can provide a full ranking for the DMUs to be evaluated | (1)Can more accurately reflect differences among efficient DMUs than simple efficiency |
| Weakness | (1)Poor discriminating power by rating frequently too many efficient DMUs (2)All efficient DMUs are treated equally in terms of efficiency | (1)Non-uniqueness of CES. (2)Can't generate consistent rankings for DMUs with many inputs and many outputs | (1)Can't use super efficiency score (SES) as a relative evaluation between any pair of DMUs |
| DEA method | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional DEA | Cross efficiency DEA | Super efficiency DEA | |
| Strength | (1)Can separate efficient DMUs from DMUs to be evaluated | (1)Can use cross efficiency score (CES) as a relative evaluation between any pair of DMUs (2)Can provide a full ranking for the DMUs to be evaluated | (1)Can more accurately reflect differences among efficient DMUs than simple efficiency |
| Weakness | (1)Poor discriminating power by rating frequently too many efficient DMUs (2)All efficient DMUs are treated equally in terms of efficiency | (1)Non-uniqueness of CES. (2)Can't generate consistent rankings for DMUs with many inputs and many outputs | (1)Can't use super efficiency score (SES) as a relative evaluation between any pair of DMUs |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.