Table 11 Showing results of direct,...

Table 11

Showing results of direct, indirect and total effect

Direct effect	β	T stat	p-values	CIBaC	VIF	f2
II → PICs	0.559	11.637	0.000	0.526–0.732	1.000	0.626**
II → PP	−0.067	0.346	0.341	−0.067–0.298	1.627	0.011
II → MPPS	0.374	6.355	0.000	0.167–0.486	1.000	0.096
PICs → PP	0.315	4.358	0.000	0.201–0.572	1.802	0.086
MPPS → PP	0.521	9.711	0.000	0.070–0.360	1.212	0.067
Indirect effect	β	T stat	p-values	CIBaC	VAF
II → PICs → PP	0.176	3.974	0.000	0.125–0.392	57.89%	Full Mediation
II → MPPS → PP	0.195	4.425	0.000	0.000–0.148	64.14%	Full Mediation
Total effect	β	T stat	p-values	CIBaC
II → PICs	0.559	10.857	0.000	0.526–0.732
II → PP	0.304	4.237	0.000	0.287–0.554
II → MPPS	0.374	5.397	0.000	0.167–0.486
PICs → PP	0.315	4.358	0.000	0.201–0.572
MPPS → PP	0.521	9.711	0.000	0.070–0.360
Prediction quality criteria	R²	AdjR²	Q²	RMSE	MAE	Q²_predict
PP	0.502	0.493	0.404	0.967	0.772	0.074
PICs	0.313	0.309	0.303	0.841	0.628	0.302
MPPS	0.140	0.135	0.107	0.942	0.732	0.123

Direct effect	β	T stat	p-values	CIBaC	VIF	f2
II → PICs	0.559	11.637	0.000	0.526–0.732	1.000	0.626**
II → PP	−0.067	0.346	0.341	−0.067–0.298	1.627	0.011
II → MPPS	0.374	6.355	0.000	0.167–0.486	1.000	0.096
PICs → PP	0.315	4.358	0.000	0.201–0.572	1.802	0.086
MPPS → PP	0.521	9.711	0.000	0.070–0.360	1.212	0.067
Indirect effect	β	T stat	p-values	CIBaC	VAF
II → PICs → PP	0.176	3.974	0.000	0.125–0.392	57.89%	Full Mediation
II → MPPS → PP	0.195	4.425	0.000	0.000–0.148	64.14%	Full Mediation
Total effect	β	T stat	p-values	CIBaC
II → PICs	0.559	10.857	0.000	0.526–0.732
II → PP	0.304	4.237	0.000	0.287–0.554
II → MPPS	0.374	5.397	0.000	0.167–0.486
PICs → PP	0.315	4.358	0.000	0.201–0.572
MPPS → PP	0.521	9.711	0.000	0.070–0.360
Prediction quality criteria	R²	AdjR²	Q²	RMSE	MAE	Q²_predict
PP	0.502	0.493	0.404	0.967	0.772	0.074
PICs	0.313	0.309	0.303	0.841	0.628	0.302
MPPS	0.140	0.135	0.107	0.942	0.732	0.123

Notes:

Legend: II = information integration; PICs = procurement internal controls; PP = procurement performance; MPPS = materials and purchasing procedure standardization; **p < 0.001

Source: Table was created by the authors after analysis for hypotheses test through PLS-SEM in SmartPLS

[ViewLarge]