The association between the observation template questions and Merriam’s (1988) checklist, Proctor et al.'s (2011) implementation outcomes and the CFIR Damschroder et al., 2009
| Merriam (1988) broad checklist | Question number | |
|---|---|---|
Setting | Preliminary Q | |
Participants | Preliminary Q | |
Activities | 1-15 | |
Subtle factors (e.g. non-verbal communication, unplanned events | 1-15 | |
Implementation Outcomes (Proctoret al., 2011) | Definition | Question Number |
Acceptability | Satisfaction with the intervention (I like the intervention, it’s appealing, I approve, I welcome it) | 1, 9, 10 |
Fidelity | Adherence, delivered as intended | 2,4,5,69 |
Feasibility | Suitability of the intervention for everyday use (the intervention’s implementable, doable, easy to do/use) | 8, 13 |
Adoption | Uptake, utilisation | 9, 13 |
Appropriateness | Compatibility, relevance (the intervention’s suitable, applicable, a good fit) | 4, 8, 9, 11 |
Cost | Cost of the intervention, the implementation strategy used and location of delivery | 12 |
Penetration | Reach, level of institutionalisation | Preliminary Question |
Sustainability | Maintenance, routinisation | |
CFIR Domain (Damschroderet al.., 2009) | Question Number | |
Intervention Characteristics- internally vs externally developed, adaptability, complexity, cost, strength of evidence | 6 | |
Outer Setting- patient’s needs, degree to which the organisation is networked to other organisations, competitive pressure to implement (competing organisation), external incentives (guidelines) | Preliminary Q | |
Inner Setting- age, maturity, size of the organisation, team stability, communication, culture, readiness for change | 1, 7, 9, 10 | |
Individual Characteristics- knowledge and belief about the intervention, belief in own capabilities, personal traits (motivation, values, intellectual ability, tolerance, ambiguity) | 4, 10, 12 | |
Implementation Process- planning and executing the intervention, engaging and involving the appropriate individuals, reflection and evaluation (debriefing) | 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15 | |
| Merriam (1988) broad checklist | Question number | |
|---|---|---|
Setting | Preliminary Q | |
Participants | Preliminary Q | |
Activities | 1-15 | |
Subtle factors (e.g. non-verbal communication, unplanned events | 1-15 | |
Acceptability | Satisfaction with the intervention (I like the intervention, it’s appealing, I approve, I welcome it) | 1, 9, 10 |
Fidelity | Adherence, delivered as intended | 2,4,5,69 |
Feasibility | Suitability of the intervention for everyday use (the intervention’s implementable, doable, easy to do/use) | 8, 13 |
Adoption | Uptake, utilisation | 9, 13 |
Appropriateness | Compatibility, relevance (the intervention’s suitable, applicable, a good fit) | 4, 8, 9, 11 |
Cost | Cost of the intervention, the implementation strategy used and location of delivery | 12 |
Penetration | Reach, level of institutionalisation | Preliminary Question |
Sustainability | Maintenance, routinisation | |
6 | ||
Preliminary Q | ||
1, 7, 9, 10 | ||
4, 10, 12 | ||
2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15 | ||
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.