Key features of successful and unsuccessful cases
| Domain | Key features | Successful cases | Unsuccessful cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Condition | Contested ownership of osteoporosis services | High levels | High levels |
| Technology | Support for logistical and technical requirements of mobile DXA service | Generally strong | Poor |
| Value proposition | Prioritisation of osteoporosis services in context of local and national healthcare priorities | High priority | Variable priority |
| Perceptions of rurality and shared value of mobile services | Overall consistent | Variable | |
| Adopter system | Impact on staff working practices | Significant | Significant |
| Presence and continuity of key service champions | Strong | Variable | |
| Cross-boundary communications and influence | Strong and consistent | Variable quality and patchy | |
| Patient perspective on service development | Overall positive | Mixed | |
| Health/Care organisation | Configuration and stability of local osteoporosis services | Stable and well established | Unstable or under-developed |
| Quality of local operational management support | Variable | Variable | |
| Existing infrastructure and processes to support mobile services | Absent | Absent | |
| Wider system | Coherence of national healthcare policy | Poor | Poor |
| Complexity of relationships between providers | High complexity | High complexity | |
| Embedding and adapting over time | Individual and organisation adaptability and flexibility | High levels | Poor |
| Service evaluation, feedback and learning | High levels | Poor |
| Domain | Key features | Successful cases | Unsuccessful cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Condition | Contested ownership of osteoporosis services | High levels | High levels |
| Technology | Support for logistical and technical requirements of mobile DXA service | Generally strong | Poor |
| Value proposition | Prioritisation of osteoporosis services in context of local and national healthcare priorities | High priority | Variable priority |
| Perceptions of rurality and shared value of mobile services | Overall consistent | Variable | |
| Adopter system | Impact on staff working practices | Significant | Significant |
| Presence and continuity of key service champions | Strong | Variable | |
| Cross-boundary communications and influence | Strong and consistent | Variable quality and patchy | |
| Patient perspective on service development | Overall positive | Mixed | |
| Health/Care organisation | Configuration and stability of local osteoporosis services | Stable and well established | Unstable or under-developed |
| Quality of local operational management support | Variable | Variable | |
| Existing infrastructure and processes to support mobile services | Absent | Absent | |
| Wider system | Coherence of national healthcare policy | Poor | Poor |
| Complexity of relationships between providers | High complexity | High complexity | |
| Embedding and adapting over time | Individual and organisation adaptability and flexibility | High levels | Poor |
| Service evaluation, feedback and learning | High levels | Poor |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.