Table 3

Factors that influence SMTs' development pattern

Theoretical explorationEmpirical analysis
FactorInfluenceAuthorsInfluenceData source(s)
Individual level
Individual human capital+Dunphy and Bryant (1996), Van Amelsvoort and Benders (1996), Balkema and Molleman (1999), Powell and Pazos (2017) +Retrospective interviews
Team member attitudes±Van Amelsvoort and Benders (1996), Hut and Molleman (1998), Balkema and Molleman (1999) ±Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Perceived workloadNot described −Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Team level
Psychological safety+Raes et al. (2015), O' leary (2016) +Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Team turnover−Wellins et al. (1991), Cashman et al. (2004), O' leary (2016) ∩Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Team size
Nature of the task
Bureaucratic history
−
Not described
Not described
Hut and Molleman (1998), Wheelan et al. (2003), Wheelan (2009), Powell and Pazos (2017)
Mcgrath (1991), Morgan et al. (1993), Wheelan (2005) 
∩
±
±
Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Retrospective interviews
Retrospective interviews
Organizational level
Management style±Hut and Molleman (1998), Balkema and Molleman (1999) ±Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Material support+Wellins et al. (1991), Morgan et al. (1993), Dunphy and Bryant (1996), Van Amelsvoort and Benders (1996), Cashman et al. (2004) +Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Social supportNot described +Retrospective interviews
Environmental level
Requisite for self- management+Dunphy and Bryant (1996), Hut and Molleman (1998), Balkema and Molleman (1999) Not identifiedRetrospective interviews

Note(s): + = Positive influence, − = Negative influence, ± = Both positive and negative influence, ∩ = Inverted U-shaped influence

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options