Table 3

Factors that influence SMTs' development pattern

Theoretical explorationEmpirical analysis
FactorInfluenceAuthorsInfluenceData source(s)
Individual level
Individual human capital+Dunphy and Bryant (1996), Van Amelsvoort and Benders (1996), Balkema and Molleman (1999), Powell and Pazos (2017) +Retrospective interviews
Team member attitudes±Van Amelsvoort and Benders (1996), Hut and Molleman (1998), Balkema and Molleman (1999) ±Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Perceived workloadNot described Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Team level
Psychological safety+Raes et al. (2015), O' leary (2016) +Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Team turnoverWellins et al. (1991), Cashman et al. (2004), O' leary (2016) Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Team size
Nature of the task
Bureaucratic history

Not described
Not described
Hut and Molleman (1998), Wheelan et al. (2003), Wheelan (2009), Powell and Pazos (2017)
Mcgrath (1991), Morgan et al. (1993), Wheelan (2005) 

±
±
Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Retrospective interviews
Retrospective interviews
Organizational level
Management style±Hut and Molleman (1998), Balkema and Molleman (1999) ±Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Material support+Wellins et al. (1991), Morgan et al. (1993), Dunphy and Bryant (1996), Van Amelsvoort and Benders (1996), Cashman et al. (2004) +Retrospective interviews, SMT observations
Social supportNot described +Retrospective interviews
Environmental level
Requisite for self- management+Dunphy and Bryant (1996), Hut and Molleman (1998), Balkema and Molleman (1999) Not identifiedRetrospective interviews

Note(s): + = Positive influence, − = Negative influence, ± = Both positive and negative influence, ∩ = Inverted U-shaped influence

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal