Critical appraisal results of eligible qualitative studies in systematic review of online text-based intervention and eating disorder management
| Citation | Yager (2001) [52] | Yager (2003) [53] | Moessner et al. (2012) [54] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Congruity between philosophical perspective and methodology | Y | Y | Y |
| Congruity between methodology and question | Y | Y | Y |
| Congruity between methodology and data collection | Y | Y | Y |
| Congruity between methodology and presenting data | Y | Y | Y |
| Congruity between methodology and results | Y | Y | Y |
| Cultural and theoretical location | N | U | U |
| Influence of researcher | U | U | Y |
| Participants' voice represented | Y | Y | Y |
| Ethical approval | Y | Y | Y |
| Conclusion | Y | Y | Y |
| Total | Good | Good | Good |
| Citation | Yager (2001) [ | Yager (2003) [ | Moessner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Congruity between philosophical perspective and methodology | Y | Y | Y |
| Congruity between methodology and question | Y | Y | Y |
| Congruity between methodology and data collection | Y | Y | Y |
| Congruity between methodology and presenting data | Y | Y | Y |
| Congruity between methodology and results | Y | Y | Y |
| Cultural and theoretical location | N | U | U |
| Influence of researcher | U | U | Y |
| Participants' voice represented | Y | Y | Y |
| Ethical approval | Y | Y | Y |
| Conclusion | Y | Y | Y |
| Total | Good | Good | Good |
Note(s): Abbreviations: Y = Yes; N = No; U = Unclear
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.