Table V AUC values of comparison results...

Table V

AUC values of comparison results with different models using the selected features and all features in each LC scenario

	LLC Scenario 0_0				LLC Scenario 0_1				LLC Scenario 1_0				LLC Scenario 1_1
Feature type	SVM	NB	DT	KNN	SVM	NB	DT	KNN	SVM	NB	DT	KNN	SVM	NB	DT	KNN
All Features	0.90	0.85	0.82	0.96	0.92	0.85	0.94	0.99	0.88	0.94	0.99	0.98	0.93	0.97	0.99	0.98
Selected	0.99	0.81↓	0.98	0.98	0.84↓	0.78↓	0.97	0.99	1	0.93↓	0.99	1	0.99	0.96↓	0.98↓	0.99
Improvement (%)	10.0	−4.7	19.5	2.0	−8.6	−8.2	3.1	0	13.6	−1.0	0	2.0	6.4	−1.0	−1.0	1.0
	RLC Scenario 0_0				RLC Scenario 0_1				RLC Scenario 1_0				RLC Scenario 1_1
All Features	0.93	0.83	0.92	0.97	0.92	0.93	0.97	0.96	0.94	0.87	0.91	0.97	0.95	0.94	0.99	0.96
Selected	0.97	0.75↓	0.98	0.99	0.99	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.80↓	0.98	0.99	0.99	0.95	0.98↓	1
Improvement (%)	4.3	−9.6	6.5	2.0	7.6	5.3	1.0	2.0	4.2	−8.0	7.6	1.0	4.2	1.0	−1.0	4.1

	LLC Scenario 0_0				LLC Scenario 0_1				LLC Scenario 1_0				LLC Scenario 1_1
Feature type	SVM	NB	DT	KNN	SVM	NB	DT	KNN	SVM	NB	DT	KNN	SVM	NB	DT	KNN
All Features	0.90	0.85	0.82	0.96	0.92	0.85	0.94	0.99	0.88	0.94	0.99	0.98	0.93	0.97	0.99	0.98
Selected	0.99	0.81↓	0.98	0.98	0.84↓	0.78↓	0.97	0.99	1	0.93↓	0.99	1	0.99	0.96↓	0.98↓	0.99
Improvement (%)	10.0	−4.7	19.5	2.0	−8.6	−8.2	3.1	0	13.6	−1.0	0	2.0	6.4	−1.0	−1.0	1.0
	RLC Scenario 0_0				RLC Scenario 0_1				RLC Scenario 1_0				RLC Scenario 1_1
All Features	0.93	0.83	0.92	0.97	0.92	0.93	0.97	0.96	0.94	0.87	0.91	0.97	0.95	0.94	0.99	0.96
Selected	0.97	0.75↓	0.98	0.99	0.99	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.80↓	0.98	0.99	0.99	0.95	0.98↓	1
Improvement (%)	4.3	−9.6	6.5	2.0	7.6	5.3	1.0	2.0	4.2	−8.0	7.6	1.0	4.2	1.0	−1.0	4.1