Overview of results of HEI-interviews and interactive workshops on the implementation of ICR in the HEI sector focussing on HEI as organisations
| Topic No. | Austria | Slovakia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Austrian Ministry | Slovak Ministry |
| An ICR methodology of universities can include more than a standard ICR of businesses | It is planned to set up a new steering tool including indicators for HEIs – ICR could be an inspiration for this | |
| Austrian Universities | Slovak Universities | |
| ICR is not or only partially deployed as a strategic management tool so far (e.g. different organisational and scientific structure of the ICR classification and the HEI´s own systems); Effort exceeds benefits gained from ICR reporting so far (mainly because it is only a reporting tool yet, not fully exploited and causing too much additional efforts compared to benefit) | There are already too many vaguely set strategic goals, but no monitoring for fulfilment | |
| 2 | Austrian Ministry | Slovak Ministry |
| A major challenge is the heterogeneity of the universities; Correct data-clearing is crucial, because the data collecting is done decentralised | The large salary gap between the HEI and business sector is a challenge, the HEI salaries are too low (HEI as part of the public sector has a system of “standard table salaries”) > brain-drain from HEIs | |
| Austrian Universities | Slovak Universities | |
| The ICR reporting structure does not take into consideration the heterogeneity of universities yet; The binding research classification is not always suitable to picture the universities own research structure and classification | More transparency needed and an improved classification (different HEI types); Slovak faculties function as separate entities with high power (although the statutory representative and the link to the Ministry remains at rector level); Intra-organisational communication between levels and faculties is difficult; There are too many universities relatively to the population; Problem of “Flying Professors”: > incentives needed for career development, employee’s motivation (e.g. financial motivation to represent the own HEI via publishing, research or commercial projects); Cooperation with business sector exists on different levels, but is considered still weak in each category |
| Topic No. | Austria | Slovakia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Austrian Ministry | Slovak Ministry |
| An ICR methodology of universities can include more than a standard ICR of businesses | It is planned to set up a new steering tool including indicators for HEIs – ICR could be an inspiration for this | |
| Austrian Universities | Slovak Universities | |
| ICR is not or only partially deployed as a strategic management tool so far (e.g. different organisational and scientific structure of the ICR classification and the HEI´s own systems); | There are already too many vaguely set strategic goals, but no monitoring for fulfilment | |
| 2 | Austrian Ministry | Slovak Ministry |
| A major challenge is the heterogeneity of the universities; | The large salary gap between the HEI and business sector is a challenge, the HEI salaries are too low (HEI as part of the public sector has a system of “standard table salaries”) > brain-drain from HEIs | |
| Austrian Universities | Slovak Universities | |
| The ICR reporting structure does not take into consideration the heterogeneity of universities yet; | More transparency needed and an improved classification (different HEI types); |
Note: The table contrasts the findings from the Austrian vs the Slovakian system
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.